Wikisource talk:Maintenance of the Month/Sister-project link standardization

Good Intentions
I know everyone involved has good intentions, and I hope you will not be offended by the community discussions I have or will be beginning soon. Maintenance of the Month is a wonderful project, and you all do great work. This month I believe you just made some decisions that are not in accord with the greater community consensus. Jeepday (talk) 10:59, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

Deletion Discussion
Generally Deletions are discussed at Proposed deletions before being performed. An example would be the recent discussion on sister links where it was depreciated.) Depreciated DOES NOT EQUAL Delete. After the discussion at Scriptorium slows down, I plan to start a discussion at Proposed deletions on the templates recently deleted by this project. Jeepday (talk) 10:59, 6 January 2013 (UTC)


 * I agree with the above statement of user Jeepday, that your project has "good intentions", but in my opinion this needs more discussion of unforeseen/unintended consequences. Especially how it might affect and . For example, this is a highly used template in wikipedia and may have unexpected consequences as i outlined here []. IMO, this is a fascinating topic and worthy of discussion especially by someone fluent in | wikicode. --206.248.165.102 22:36, 11 January 2013 (UTC) | talk

Deletion discussion started Proposed_deletions. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 11:53, 10 January 2013 (UTC)


 * I see that Wikipedia excerpt has been un-deleted, is additional organization required to restore the templates and content that were deleted? JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 15:40, 15 January 2013 (UTC)