Valdes v. Valdes/Opinion of the Court

Messrs. F. Kingsbury Curtis, John G. Carlisle, and Henry A. Stickney for plaintiff in error.

Mr. Willis Sweet for defendants in error.

Per Curiam: Writs of Error dismissed for want of jurisdictional amounts. Act of April 12, 1900, chap. 191, 31 Stat. at L. 77, §§ 34, 35; act of March 2, 1901, chap. 812, 31 Stat. at L. 953, § 3; Royal Ins. Co. v. Martin, 192 U.S. 149, 159, 48 L. ed. 385, 388, 24 Sup. Ct. Rep. 247; Ortega v. Lara, 202 U.S. 339, 50 L. ed. 1055, 26 Sup. Ct. Rep. 707; Perez v. Fernandez, 202 U.S. 80, 50 L. ed. 942, 26 Sup. Ct. Rep. 561; Garrozi v. Dastas, 204 U.S. 64, 73, 51 L. ed. 369, 376, 27 Sup. Ct. Rep. 224.