User talk:Xpctr8

— billinghurst  sDrewth  03:54, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

Nice job
Congratulations on your first completed work. Job well done. Please do add it to Template:New texts (drop the bottom link to the archive list) with an identifying edit summary, and that will add it to the front page. — billinghurst  sDrewth  06:05, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Commons deletion requests
Hello! Some of Your files have been nominated for deletion at Commons. I've removed the offending Google lead page from one of them and could remove it from the other too if asked. They still need some care here att Src, maybe by a bot. Edaen (talk) 13:13, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Table
Thank you very much for the table at Page:Forth Bridge (1890).djvu/17. I've only just seen it, but they are the only bit of this work I can't do myself, so any help is very much appreciated. Many thanks, Jamesx12345 (talk) 14:31, 27 September 2014 (UTC)


 * You are more than welcome. Building those tables is almost therapeutic for me after looking at pages of solid text in some of the other books I'm working on. If you can tag the problematic pages with when you come across one, it will make it much easier for me to find those pages and knock them out. -Xpctr8 (talk) 14:37, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Long footnote
Please accept my apologies for interfering with your progress on Index:Baylee's Method of Finding the Longitude.djvu. I thought having started the long footnote starting on page 5 and extending through to page 7 it unfair not to complete at least that. Having done so (and I look forward to how the final transclusion works out—I am hoping a simple smallrefs will present a usable result—but probably only an actual trial will establish this.) I shall now lay off and let you return to normal activity. AuFCL (talk) 02:00, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
 * (small addition) For the record my (unsaved) test was:
 * —which presented the four footnotes in (what I considered was) a reasonable form and ordering. AuFCL (talk) 02:15, 22 May 2016 (UTC)


 * No appology necessary, help is always appreciated! I was pulled away right after starting to proofread, was happy to see some unexpected progress. Xpctr8 (talk) 15:06, 22 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Ah, now I see what you mean...the footnote to the footnote on Page:Baylee%27s_Method_of_Finding_the_Longitude.djvu/11. I dealt with this on a prior work by using reference groups, calling the second level something like "subnote". See Memoirs_of_a_Trait_in_the_Character_of_George_III._of_these_United_Kingdoms/Chapter_13 for an example. (source: Page%3AMemoirs_of_a_Trait_in_the_Character_of_George_III.djvu/59 Xpctr8 (talk) 15:11, 22 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Yes. The "easy" way of doing this is to let just flatten everything—which currently appears to result in the primary footnotes appearing as "lower" footnote numbers, and the footnotes-to-footnotes being tacked on as "higher" footnote numbers. If you so prefer it should be possible to group footnotes-to-footnotes alongside their immediate senior notes but this will be somewhat trickier as some of the "senior" notes span one or more pages&hellip;  I am of the view that here there is no necessity to resort to reference groups but if it is a technique you are happier using I am fine with that. AuFCL (talk) 18:18, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey
Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 22:25, 13 January 2017 (UTC)