User talk:St0k0s

— billinghurst  sDrewth  00:09, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

Please do not add spurious delete templates to valid pages.--Longfellow (talk) 20:26, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
 * These are not "valid pages". The original documents do not exist and/or do not back the sources given. If you want to prove your claims, please do so. St0k0s (talk) 21:30, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I believe that Longfellow is indicating that if you wish to propose the deletion of the document that you also need to start the conversation at WS:PD rather than leaving the page tagged and isolated. I have added some commentary to the talk page of the article and fidelity into the notes, which I believe where the issue lies. — billinghurst  sDrewth  00:09, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

Talkback
To address your concerns on how we present the work of concern, I have started a discussion on the principles. You may wish to contribute to the principles of the discussion, though I would say that the specifics of the case still belong on the article's talk page. — billinghurst  sDrewth  01:58, 17 May 2010 (UTC)