User talk:Philbarker

Beeswaxcandle (talk) 18:31, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey
Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this survey on the project page and see how your feedback helps the Wikimedia Foundation support editors like you. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement (in English). Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through the EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys to remove you from the list.

Thank you! WMF Surveys, 18:36, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey
Every response for this survey can help the Wikimedia Foundation improve your experience on the Wikimedia projects. So far, we have heard from just 29% of Wikimedia contributors. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes to be completed. Take the survey now.

If you have already taken the survey, we are sorry you've received this reminder. We have design the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. If you wish to opt-out of the next reminder or any other survey, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. Thanks! WMF Surveys, 01:34, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey
Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 23 April, 2018 (07:00 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

'''If you already took the survey - thank you! We will not bother you again.''' We have designed the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. To opt-out of future surveys, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. WMF Surveys, 00:43, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

Naming subpages
"Works that have chapters/sections should be numbered, not named..." So Omniana/Volume 1/Chapter 1 instead of Omniana/Volume 1/Mirrors. Please refer to Style guide.
 * Thanks for the comment. They're not really chapters or consecutive sections, they're independent articles, a bit like the entries in [|Encyclopedia Brittanica] or [|DNB, so I took my lead from there and used the article names for section names. I really don't think that calling the article on Mirrors "Chapter 1" or "Section 1" would make much sense. --[[User:Philbarker|Philbarker]] (talk) 08:37, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
 * But the source copy you're using has them numbered, so we would follow the numbers per our MoS. --EncycloPetey (talk) 15:19, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
 * The work is a collection of articles, each was published originally in a magazine, and some later in another collection MoS: "When a work is a collection, then the subpages are works in their own right (e.g. poetry), and the section name should be for that of the work." I can add numbers, so Omniana/Volume 1/1. Mirrors. seems the way to go.Philbarker (talk) 16:16, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
 * PS: example of similar book Table_Talk_(Hazlitt)
 * The preference is for numbering, but names are used in edited collections. Mixing both numbers and names is generally a bad idea. --EncycloPetey (talk) 16:22, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Edited collection seems like a good description of Omniana. Published originally in the Atheneum by Southey and Coleridge (anonymously) Edited by Southey (again anonymously) into the 1812 edition; and later the Coleridge contributions + others were put into other collections (e.g. "Coleridge's Table Talk and Omniana", ed H N Coleridge (1836) ) Philbarker (talk) 16:36, 8 June 2018 (UTC)