User talk:Nickw25

Beeswaxcandle (talk) 18:39, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey
Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this survey on the project page and see how your feedback helps the Wikimedia Foundation support editors like you. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement (in English). Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through the EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys to remove you from the list.

Thank you! WMF Surveys, 18:36, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey
Every response for this survey can help the Wikimedia Foundation improve your experience on the Wikimedia projects. So far, we have heard from just 29% of Wikimedia contributors. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes to be completed. Take the survey now.

If you have already taken the survey, we are sorry you've received this reminder. We have design the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. If you wish to opt-out of the next reminder or any other survey, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. Thanks! WMF Surveys, 01:34, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey
Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 23 April, 2018 (07:00 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

'''If you already took the survey - thank you! We will not bother you again.''' We have designed the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. To opt-out of future surveys, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. WMF Surveys, 00:43, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

Uncle Tom's cabin
Looks like you're answering my questions in your actions and edit summaries, but maybe also document these in the index's talk page?

From your edit summaries (and my looking at Uncle_Tom%27s_Cabin) there is no source for the existing copy we have, which does always make me nervous. And I say that from the experience of finding that the AKJV Psalms text we had, had *not* directly come from the AKJV, but had gone through other hands and other transformations. Which included at the worst missing sentences and phrases!

And you seem to be copying over from the text copy we have had, to initialize the text of each page? Thus the message to the reviewers should be:
 * relax (somewhat) most of the work (presumably) is done,
 * **but**
 * there is no reason to trust the copy matches the source - scrutinize _carefully_!

I was amazed at the differences I found between so-called 'same' texts. 'same' here? ;-) Shenme (talk) 06:19, 14 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Thanks User:Shenme; I'll make a note on the talk page shortly. Definitely a few subtle differences, it looks like the existing unsourced text was copied in from Gutenberg. I don't intend to bulk import it; just keeping a bit ahead of what I can work through myself. I'll also put a save in between importing it and checking it to show what is changed as well :) Nickw25 (talk) 07:38, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Generally speaking, a page that is lacking significant content, such as an illustration should not be marked as "proofread". "Proofread" means that the page has been fully checked against the original and its content matches. Where illustrations are missing, that is not the case. --EncycloPetey (talk) 22:23, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I've updated these now. I'll adjust my workflow to add this illustrations in prior to marking the page read, I'd been backfilling them each chapter or two up until now. Nickw25 (talk) 02:15, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

template:article link
Hi. For the author page listing, we have the above linked template that will produce a standard listing format. If you are going to be numbers of works for this journal, then please let me know and I will produce a template based on "article link" specific for your use, probably would call it "JNH link". Ping me if you want it. — billinghurst  sDrewth  06:57, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
 * That is very useful to know, thanks for the tip billinghurst. I'd like to keep adding articles from this Journal over time. Is there a benefit to using a specific template? The one you have shared looks fairly straight forward to fill in each time? Nickw25 (talk) 11:21, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
 * The advantages apart from the obvious uniformity is that we can run better checks and feed data into WD using tools like Paleim's Harvest tool. Plus as we improve formatting, we can make it to the base template, and it flows out to many. I will get it done. — billinghurst  sDrewth  11:25, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
 * ✅ => JNH link. Noting that it is currently only fully configured for volume 7. If get into earlier or later volumes, then we will need to do volume <+> year, and volume <=> editor tweaking for differences. — billinghurst  sDrewth  11:49, 5 September 2021 (UTC)