User talk:Mukkakukaku/Archive 1

Yann (talk) 06:22, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

A Colonial Wooing
Hey would you mind if I start working on A Colonial Wooing? Looks pretty interesting to me... - Tannertsf (talk) 18:47, 25 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Sure, feel free. I'm currently working my way through Louisa May Alcott's works, so it's pretty far down my to-do list, but I'll drop by and validate as you go. Good Luck! Mukkakukaku (talk) 02:28, 26 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Sounds great. When you do validate, feel free to let me know if there are any common mistakes I am making as I proof the work. - Tannertsf (talk) 02:47, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Anthropology
Mukkakukaku, thank you for the fine work you did on transcluding the book about Anthropology. —Maury (talk) 14:24, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

Missing pages
A friendly note to please review structural defects a bit closer. You reapplied a missing pages list and reverted the status when the talk page explained everything that was listed were printer errors. Examining the content is a pain but neccessary step when reporting structural defects. -- George Orwell III (talk) 01:52, 13 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Talk pages are generally unused here in WS so I tend not to read them unless I'm actually going to be transcribing. It doesn't help that the auto-generated hat note only says "relevant formatting guidelines may have already been established" rather than something more general like "please see the index talk page for important information before making any changes". Mukkakukaku (talk) 02:30, 13 July 2014 (UTC)

Oops
Oops,

Thanks for fixing that. It sure was generous of you to try to share the blame for what was clearly my error! Hesperian 01:32, 2 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Ha! I've done it myself so often that most of the time I assume it's my fault rather than the other way around. No worries. :) Mukkakukaku (talk) 01:44, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

Index:Characteristicks002shaf.pdf was deleted
Please see details in this post: Scriptorium/Help — Ineuw talk 18:58, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

Page:Compendium of US Copyright Office Practices (1973).pdf/11
Actually, I was converting the underlining to bold in relation to an older typesetting convention in that underlining was used was often used on typed material to indicate where items should be made bold or italic in a formally typeset (as in printed version). I won't undo your changes but I would appreciate you raising this issue on the Scriptorium, so we have a definitive MOS point on this. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:21, 24 August 2014 (UTC)