User talk:Jmabel

Hello, Jmabel, welcome to Wikisource! Thanks for your interest in the project; we hope you'll enjoy the community and your work here. If you need help, see our help pages (especially Adding texts and Wikisource's style guide). You can discuss or ask questions from the community in general at the Scriptorium. The Community Portal lists tasks you can help with if you wish. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me on my talk page. :)

Unlinked tag on History of Washington
Hi Jmabel, and thanks for contributing to Wikisource! Please assume good faith in dealings with your fellow editors. The purpose of the   tag on History of Washington was merely to indicate that the page hadn’t been linked to by any other page on Wikisource, which means that it could be harder for users to locate. Tagging a page as   flags it for users or administrators who monitor the list at Category:Unlinked to add an appropriate link, such as an author page or a link from one of the appropriate subject matter index pages under Works; it’s by no means an indication that the text should be deleted or that the contributions aren’t welcomed. I see that you have now added links from both Author:Clinton A. Snowden and Anti-Chinese Riots At Seattle, so the   tag can be removed. Tarmstro99 18:23, 4 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the clarification. I never before had someone put a tag like that on something while I was still entering it, and it does say that the page may be suitable for deletion. - Jmabel 18:25, 4 November 2007 (UTC)


 * By the way, I don't see where I failed to assume good faith. That's precisely why I asked you about it instead of simply removing the tag. - Jmabel 18:26, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

License for "Seattle: Booms and Busts"
Hi, I've happened on the fascinating Seattle: Booms and Busts. Looks like a real treasure to have this text freely licensed! As I see you explained in your initial edit.

I was wondering, do you know if there is an entry for this in OTRS? Obviously your initial upload would have been well before that system was established. But, to be sure there will be no deletion down the road if somebody is skeptical about its origins, might it be worthwhile to put an entry there, and link it from the text? -Pete (talk) 17:28, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately, I haven't got anything beyond what I did there. Your chance of tracking down the original author is about as good as mine; I've long since lost track of him, so all I'd have is the name & when he was at Yale. - Jmabel (talk) 17:33, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the quick reply! Yeah, hard to remember things from so many years ago. I'll see what I can do. -Pete (talk) 18:24, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
 * I delved through some wiki history; this is the most direct bit of info I've been able to find so far. Hope you don't mind me parking that link here for future reference, have to get on to other things now. -Pete (talk) 18:36, 18 January 2022 (UTC)