User talk:Fluffy89502

US Court Cases
Good luck, but please read WS:STYLE as some of the direct imports you are doing, are leading to misrendering, as Mediawiki reads line breaks and whitespace in particular ways, which I do not think was your intended presentation. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:11, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for letting me know. Much appreciated Fluffy89502 (talk) 10:21, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

Hepful note No 2.
Dred Scott v. Sandford, Please when adding a new text, give the URL or source you are working or importing from on the talk page. You can use textinfo to include this information on the talk page.

This is so others can be sure any errors present in the transcription where present in the original printing or manuscript. ( If you find something that is obviously a printers error you can use SIC to mark what the correct printing should be.

Also generally on Wikisource, we don't put inline page numbers (the ones you've put in bold), unless they were present in the original manuscript/printing specifically. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:26, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

PD-USGov-SCOTUS
The template PD-USGov-SCOTUS is used to tag images (see the text of the template). For written works, PD-USGov applies. WS practice in the past has been to limit the number of templates, rather than proliferate new ones. There is no separate law that requires a SCOTUS-specific license.

I have nominated the template for Deletion. --EncycloPetey (talk) 14:17, 22 June 2019 (UTC)