User talk:Einstein95

JeepdaySock (talk) 10:50, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

Index anchors in PSM
Please do not alter the Index anchors in the PSM project. Anchors are numbered according the djvu page number, separated by a hyphen and incrementally number from 1 .. 2 ... to the number of anchors per page. This is not an option but the rule, unless you are willing to redo every anchor and link it to the Index accordingly. To maintain consistency throughout the project, we laid out various rules to be followed. Please check this PSM Proofreading guide, and if you need help, please feel free to contact me.Ineuw (talk) 00:43, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

PSM references
Sorry to bother you, but I have to point out that one cannot leave both and tags in the footer because then then the second one is applied to the references and  is what we want. Ineuw (talk) 06:30, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Ah, thanks for pointing that out. I believe I saw that on another page and copied it from that. -Einstein95 (talk) 08:58, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

Translations from the Chinese
The first page of the DjVu file needs to be stripped out before proofreading. All the odd pages are in even slots and vice versa because of the extra page. Otherwise, all the pages will need to be moved and the Index renumbered later. Best to have the Goggle notice removed first. --EncycloPetey (talk) 06:57, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Would it be as easy as simply uploading a fixed djvu over the existing one at commons, or would it have to be uploaded under a new name and a new index made? -Einstein95 (talk) 07:02, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
 * It will be uploaded over the one at Commons, and the Index page name will be the same. But because it's the first page being removed, the numbering of everything will change, and the correspondence between pages and the text layer will change too. So it's best not to create the pages until the file is fixed, or all the created pages will have to be moved. --EncycloPetey (talk) 07:08, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Done. Thanks for the heads up. -Einstein95 (talk) 07:18, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

Problem having in embedded in
I'm trying to proofread this page, but having in the The less chance we have of being killed.}}

etc. The long-agreed community style is to use arabic numerals not to maintain roman numerals. — billinghurst  sDrewth  00:17, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Blast. Ok, I'll fix it and do Arabic numerals from now on. Thanks for the heads-up. -Einstein95 (talk) 04:41, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

Japan Speaks Out
You added Japan Speaks Out without a license tag. On the surface it looks to be copyrighted in the USA under the URAA; can you provide any information that suggests otherwise? —Beleg Tâl (talk) 02:27, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
 * The original file was imported from IA by . The license tag on File:Japan Speaks Out by Shingoro Takaishi.djvu is also incorrect as it appears that Shingoro Takaishi died on Feb 25th, 1967, putting it PD in places where it's life+50, not life+70. I was not aware of it being still in copyright when I started working on it. I am in favour of deleting the file, pages and index due to CopyVio. -Einstein95 (talk) 03:18, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
 * That was over a year ago, I am not sure what the rationale was, but I will leave it to you if you wish to delete it. Jasonanaggie (talk) 03:24, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey
Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this survey on the project page and see how your feedback helps the Wikimedia Foundation support editors like you. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement (in English). Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through the EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys to remove you from the list.

Thank you! WMF Surveys, 18:36, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey
Every response for this survey can help the Wikimedia Foundation improve your experience on the Wikimedia projects. So far, we have heard from just 29% of Wikimedia contributors. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes to be completed. Take the survey now.

If you have already taken the survey, we are sorry you've received this reminder. We have design the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. If you wish to opt-out of the next reminder or any other survey, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. Thanks! WMF Surveys, 01:34, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey
Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 23 April, 2018 (07:00 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

'''If you already took the survey - thank you! We will not bother you again.''' We have designed the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. To opt-out of future surveys, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. WMF Surveys, 00:44, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

Index:The Invisible Man - A Grotesque Romance.djvu
Hi, Were you collapsing apostrophised contractions like "hadn't" vs "had n't" in the text? I'd left them sepereated as in the scan, but can redo if needed? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:18, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
 * I was, but I'm having second thoughts about it. In at least one page the spacing between the word and the abbreviation was smaller than other spacing in the line, but in basically all other cases it was the same spacing. Feel free to revert my changes for those. -Einstein95 (talk) 09:20, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment: I've noticed this in a few other works. It seems to be a half-space, rather than a full-space, in the contraction. I've been collapsing them in the work I've been doing. --EncycloPetey (talk) 03:48, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

Flatland
You should probably add some sort of "under construction" notice, since your edit has disabled all the links to the sections of the work. --EncycloPetey (talk) 03:47, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Ah, sorry. I've added the links to the contents pages. I was unsure of how to do the division, whether to split them into the two parts as per the first edition or to do it per section, as per the existing text. -Einstein95 (talk) 03:51, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
 * I'd leave it as-is, since the sections are numbered sequentially. I've had some similar situations, and I don't think anything is gained by splitting the parts. --EncycloPetey (talk) 03:53, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

Author:John Skelton
There will always be authors with the same name, so generally we wouldn't move an author page, and leave a redirect unless we are going to disambiguate the root page. Then to fix all the incoming links. It doesn't make sense to move it and not disambiguate, and to not create the competitive page if it has forced the initial move. — billinghurst  sDrewth  00:09, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Sorry about that. I got caught up proofreading a Hoyt's Quotation page that the author was linked from that I forgot to make the other author's page. -Einstein95 (talk) 00:23, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Know and guilty of similar things; when one ends up with a string of open tabs chasing the end of the string, and don't get back to all the open "to do" tabs. Thanks for following up. — billinghurst  sDrewth  01:58, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

Many thanks
...for proofreading the last few pages of native American dialect in index:Oregon Historical Quarterly vol. 1.djvu! After going through the whole work, I found myself going cross-eyed editing the unfamiliar language. I got distracted by shiny objects, and it might have been months before I returned to it. What a pleasant surprise to find them "done," and done well! -Pete (talk) 07:38, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

The Oregon Trail
Hi, thanks for your efforts on The Oregon Trail. FYI you might want to check out this discussion on 's page. One thing to look out for is the slight (but apparently significant) variations from one edition to another. -Pete (talk) 14:38, 25 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Here's a listing of all the editions I've found on IA: User:Einstein95 -Einstein95 (talk) 10:22, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Ruffhead
Thanks..

If you want to review other pages feel free, MANY of the pagesused on this need overhauling, to bring them up to a common style guide :(

I've removed the long-s for reasons to do with easier proof-reading, You can put them back per sub-work if you like..

Other notes:

&c. ... Thanks for taking a look though :) ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:52, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Where there's an I/J u/v substitiution, I've applied context.
 * "Quoted" portions (marked with ' in the original shoudl be using ")
 * Ruffhead/chapter needs overhaul as it centers whilst some are hanging indented paragraphs.
 * ruffhead/header is not applied to all page headers (in some places i've used Rh/5}}
 * Anchoring approach is inconsistent

New texts
In general we don't list texts as "new" that still have problematic pages and an "incomplete" banner across the top of the work. --EncycloPetey (talk) 23:44, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Ah, sorry. I only added the incomplete due to missing images of the signatures. Not entirely confident in my ability to extract them from the text. -Einstein95 (talk) 02:17, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

Proofreading
Hello Einstein, since you've proofread Basic Law: Israel as the Nation-State of the Jewish People, shouldn't https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Index:IsraelBasicLawBill.pdf be changed to show it has been proofread? Or should it be done by someone else? MonsterHunter32 (talk) 13:14, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Sorry, marking it as "to be validated" completely slipped my mind. -Einstein95 (talk) 13:16, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

Punch...
is not yet fully transcluded into the Main. From what I can see, nothing has yet been transcluded after the Prologue. Londonjackbooks (talk) 13:58, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Oh fudge, I'll work on that before adding it in again. -Einstein95 (talk) 00:00, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

Waley
You and I were largely thinking the same thing! Thanks for adding works there. :) Mathmitch7 (talk) 14:10, 28 December 2018 (UTC)

Robert Lee Frost
"Full name" is not a reason to move a well-known author's page. There is an essay at Author names urging the use of full names. That page asserts that "[u]sing the full name of authors is the internationally-recognised standard for libraries", but a search at libraries for this author comes up with "Robert Frost" every time (except for a parenthetical use of the full name in the Dutch national database. You can see the listed forms at VIAF, for example.

Was your moved prompted by the aforementioned essay? --EncycloPetey (talk) 02:08, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

Styling
Thanks for this. Could you also do some validation (at least of the pages that aren't text-heavy--I don't expect you to go thru the whole work). Very helpful either way. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:56, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

Yale Shakespeare
This is a series with a uniform style. If you believe the style being used for the series should change dramatically, it would be best to make the suggestion before performing major changes against the selected style. --EncycloPetey (talk) 03:28, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
 * My apologies. -Einstein95 (talk) 03:52, 2 April 2019 (UTC)

Portal:Odes of Pindar
I don't understand the purpose of the anchors. What exactly is supposed to link to only the Nemean Odes by number? You'll see that this system can't really be extended to the entire set of Victory Odes because there isn't a consistent numbering system in use. The numbering differs by translator. --EncycloPetey (talk) 13:45, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Apologies, got distracted before clicking Publish. On Page:Plutarch's Lives (Clough, v.1, 1865).djvu/454 I have linked to one specific section as it merely references "Nem. VI. 3" by Pindar, and I wished to have that link to that section. It may have been too presumptuous of me to add anchors to the other Nemean Odes. -Einstein95 (talk) 13:51, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
 * It might be simpler to either link to a specific edition, or link the the "Nemean Odes" section. As I say, the numbering of some of the Odes will differ by translator, which is one reason we do not have versions pages for them. --EncycloPetey (talk) 13:54, 12 April 2019 (UTC)

Hamlet
Thanks for tackling this play. --EncycloPetey (talk) 15:30, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

Redactions
Thanks for the work on the Mueller report.

I see you are changing darkred to red for text, and shortening redactions to a single length. The red is easier to read, but I thought darkred was added to the redaction template b/c people were switching to using that (as more accurate). It doesn't matter as long as we're consistent, maybe worth adding a note to the style talkpage.

For redaction length -- that's relevant to conveying the amount of original writing that was hidden. Why shorten them? Sj (talk) 16:46, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
 * I was switching to red as per the talk page. Shortening the redactions was because otherwise they would appear fine for one editor but depending on the screen size, may appear to stretch the page width immensely or incorrectly wrap. Shortening them makes it so they appear the same for all editors. At least, that's the way I see it. -Einstein95 (talk) 01:58, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Since we deal with so many documents with redactions, I'm surprised to find that WS:REDACT doesn't exist. Seems like we should have a general guideline. I think there's merit to the positions both of you are taking here, and it seems like we should just have a simple policy, and communicate it clearly to readers and editors. or  is this something that has come up before? Is there guidance we're missing here? -Pete (talk) 07:23, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Agreed that for both having a house style is the most important thing. I feel strongly that the longest redactions deserve a few redact|full bars; the nuances of shorter ones has many solutions including improving the template itself to support different lengths. Warmly, Sj (talk) 15:06, 9 May 2019 (UTC)

Guy Mannering
Since all of the volume title pages are on Guy Mannering, do you think we should still have separate volume titles like Guy Mannering/Volume 1 linked in the transcription view? Kges1901 (talk) 00:10, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
 * I've moved everything to separate volume pages. -Einstein95 (talk) 13:34, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

Community Insights Survey
Share your experience in this survey

Hi ,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. [mailto:surveys@wikimedia.org Email us] if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely, RMaung (WMF) 14:34, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey
Share your experience in this survey

Hi ,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. [mailto:surveys@wikimedia.org Email us] if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely, RMaung (WMF) 19:13, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey
Share your experience in this survey

Hi ,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. [mailto:surveys@wikimedia.org Email us] if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely, RMaung (WMF) 17:04, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

Block center
Perhaps as you found an issue with block center/s you will be able to repair the lint error here?

Page:Sir Walter Raleigh by Thoreau, Henry David,.djvu/122

Thanks. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:32, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Now resolved, Thanks. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 19:02, 26 January 2020 (UTC)

The Conquest of Bread is proofread
Would you like to continue doing the transclusion? I’m very clumsy though could get it done, if you can not. Did you know that this is a text for r/soclit on Reddit? It would be fantastic if we could do an annotated version on Wikiversity but apparently this hasn’t been set up yet. Do you know who might be able do the wizardry required? Cheers, Zoeannl (talk) 03:08, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

We sent you an e-mail
Hello ,

Really sorry for the inconvenience. This is a gentle note to request that you check your email. We sent you a message titled "The Community Insights survey is coming!". If you have questions, email surveys@wikimedia.org.

You can see my explanation here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:48, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

The Familiar
I don't understand why you moved this page. It was a disambiguation page. --EncycloPetey (talk) 01:36, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Ah expletives, I wasn't aware of it at the time. I mistakenly blindly moved the page when moving a bunch of other stories from In a Glass Darkly. I deeply apologise. -- ei (talk) 05:41, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

UK cable on Tiananmen Square Massacre
Hi,

UK cable on Tiananmen Square Massacre—that you uploaded and proofread—lacks license information. Please add the apposite license tag, And since a quick peek at the license tag for the file on Commons suggests it is not obviously applicable (see the criterion listed in the copyright tag itself), please also check carefully that this work actually is compatibly licensed and provide rationale if the reason is non-obvious. Xover (talk) 19:32, 16 September 2022 (UTC)