User talk:41.43.33.211

january 1 is correct, sources are everywhere, including the 2013 award winner book the trilogy!!!

 * The revert was OK, because the original book contains only the text "January, 1902" and so nothing else should be added to the transcription of the text. See https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=uc2.ark:/13960/t7wm16490 --Jan Kameníček (talk) 14:43, 28 August 2021 (UTC)


 * it was not a good revert as january 1 date is placed on american books since forever, it does not make it wrong or right!!!


 * Wikisource aims to transcribe works based on what was written inside the original text; whether or not what it says is factually accurate or complete in its description is a question separate from whether or not it actually says it. We intend to reproduce original texts verbatim, regardless of textual accuracy. PseudoSkull (talk) 03:37, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
 * I don't see the point of replying. The person editing via the IPs is a long-term vandal (see w:en:WP:LTA/GRP) who has been permanently banned across all Wikimedia projects by the WMF for extreme harassment and long-term hoaxing. But for the reply to the banned user's spam (the links above are grossly inappropriate and has been globally blacklisted due to abuse), I would have blanked it entirely. I would still have those links redacted if possible. JavaHurricane (talk) 04:24, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
 * I didn't know the situation; I just responded to what was apparent to me at that time. But thanks for clarifying things. I'll keep an eye out for similar vandalism and block it immediately if it looks indisputably the same. PseudoSkull (talk) 05:13, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you! JavaHurricane (talk) 05:39, 5 June 2022 (UTC)