Template talk:Sisterprojects

The Proposed Template
J.Steinbock

Wikipedia Sister project
I just noticed that an anon actually went ahead and muddied up the Wikipedia slogan. Cute, but I actually thought we had agreed not to do this? If no one objects let's change it back. Dovi 03:53, 27 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Changed back to "The free encyclopedia". // [ admin ] Pathoschild (talk/map) 04:06, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

Interwiki link to vi:
Please add an interwiki link to the Vietnamese version of this template:

vi:Tiêu bản:Liên quan Wikisource

Thanks.

– Minh Nguyễn (talk, contribs, blog) 05:18, 20 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Added. // [ admin ] Pathoschild (talk/map) 13:08, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

png -> svg
please change the png images to the svg ones - thanks! --87.122.19.46 09:57, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Done. —[ admin ] Pathoschild 17:24, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

Wikiversity logo out of date
The logo needs to be updated to match the new verison. Richard001 22:54, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

Update syntax
editprotected

Please change the syntax of this template. Using a template for image links is deprecated, because there's now a new link= parameter for images. The new code would look like this: Wikisource is run by the non-profit Wikimedia, which operates several other multilingual and free-content projects:

cy:Nodyn:Wicitestunchwaer vi:Tiêu bản:Liên quan Wikisource

Thank you. --The Evil IP address (talk) 14:30, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
 * ✅, Cirt (talk) 16:22, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

For admins
Please add ru:Шаблон:Сообщество фонда Викимедиа. Regards, – Innv &#124; d &#124; m: 05:22, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
 * ✅, Cirt (talk) 16:23, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

Edit request on March 20, 2013
Editprotected "Free" should be added to the text that appears when you hover over the Wiktionary and Wikispecies logos, as they are also free-content. Thanks. King jakob c 2 (talk) 01:03, 21 March 2013 (UTC)
 * ✅ - AdamBMorgan (talk) 01:08, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

Edit request on March 20, 2013
EditprotectedThe template should also mention Wikidata. King jakob c 2 (talk) 16:50, 21 March 2013 (UTC)}}
 * ✅ - AdamBMorgan (talk) 13:05, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

New Wikivoyage logo
editprotected Please change Wikivoyage logo to new version - File:Wikivoyage-Logo-v3-icon.svg. --Kaganer (talk) 12:51, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
 * ✅ -- George Orwell III (talk) 13:39, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Wikiversity logo
The Wikiversity logo was updated in 2017 to File:Wikiversity logo 2017 en.svg, but this template still uses the old logo. Please replace {{File:Wikiversity-logo-en.svg||undefined with {{File:Wikiversity logo 2017 en.svg||undefined. Thanks. GreenComputer (talk) 15:18, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Done. And thanks for the heads up. --Xover (talk) 15:37, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

different template format
i think we should use this this version since it lines up more with the template on other projects
 * The current layout is designed to fit well on our Main Page so it's unlikely to be changed until we redesign that, which probably will not be any time soon. --Xover (talk) 11:54, 10 August 2021 (UTC)


 * The suggested template is certainly more modern and probably more accessible (due to the more readable and, well, text-y, text). We could do worse than at least adapting some of that to fit our main page. Especially on mobile, where there's no hover, so the title attributes can't convey a "WTH is this one" hint.
 * But will need a (small) amount of finagling to get a decent responsive result: Sisterprojects No Text might be narrower, but it's still too wide for a mobile screen and doesn't reflow. Inductiveload— talk/contribs 13:00, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
 * @Inductiveload: The current template does reflow (it's a flexbox); and it's hidden on mobile in any case (deliberately). And the current version is more accessible in that it doesn't use a layout table and includes actual alt text. Whether we want a different layout for aesthetic reasons, or text labels for non-a11y reasons, is a different discussion. To me the biggest issue with it is that the project logos are so disparate that they just plain look messy. The No-text variant hides that problem by making the logos uniformly small enough that they're just indistinct colour blobs. At which point, do we even need the logos?I've been toying with various non-square/non-grid-y layouts for the logos where their disparity won't be so obvious. But just using text labels and a small tag line would also be a reasonable approach. Minimalism being all the rage an’ all. Xover (talk) 14:49, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

Edit request on August 23, 2023
The template should also mention Wikifunctions. 24.155.154.15 02:08, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
 * ❌ It is already an incomplete list so this isn't an automatic update, and I don't think that this is the page for the conversation on what is contained and what is not. Please raise at WS:Scriptorium — billinghurst  sDrewth  22:33, 24 August 2023 (UTC) 22:32, 24 August 2023 (UTC)

Edit request on April 6, 2023
In the text below the links, please remove the capitalisation after the colon; i.e. change the text to "And we need your help: contribute to our projects, or make a donation." Cremastra (talk) 11:52, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
 * @Cremastra: ✅ --Xover (talk) 12:45, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Cremastra (talk) 23:31, 8 April 2024 (UTC)