Template talk:Dotted cell

This is how it breaks. Your change renders all of the text; it originally only renders to the cell. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 15:51, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Xover:


 * @TE(æ)A,ea.: Thanks. And on which page did you observe this? Xover (talk) 16:40, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Xover: These pictures are from here, although I first noticed them on a different page using this template. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 16:44, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
 * @TE(æ)A,ea.: And this other page was…? Xover (talk) 18:16, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
 * I have observed the problems described by TE(æ)A,ea. too, e. g. at Page:The Bohemian Review, vol1, 1917.djvu/48. However, the partial revert by TE(æ)A,ea. did not help much, as its result was no dots at all. So I have returned it to the last working version. --Jan Kameníček (talk) 16:53, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
 * @Jan.Kamenicek: Thanks. I think I've tracked down and fixed the problem. Spot-checking shows no problems now, but I could always have missed something so I would appreciate additional checks.The issue was that this template relied on being used within TOC begin, so when it wasn't it wasn't getting any of the style definitions it needed to function. In other words, any place dotted cell was being used without TOC begin it would be broken. The fix is essentially just to include the stylesheet in this template directly. It's a little bit of extra duplication (inefficient), but it'll have to do.PS. Did I mention I really really recommend against using any of the dot leader templates? 😎 Xover (talk) 18:59, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks for fixing it, it looks good now. And another thanks for helping with various dotted templates despite the fact you do not like them at all! I still prefer using them simply because the tables look too different without them in my eyes, and because many (although not all, I admit) tables would be more difficult to read without the dot leaders. --Jan Kameníček (talk) 19:43, 19 September 2022 (UTC)