Talk:The headswoman; with illustrations in colour and woodcuts

Cygnis insignis: Why did you do this? The page breaks are necessary for export. In addition, why this edit? The formatting as you had it is incorrect. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 15:18, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
 * You have directly interfered in my contributions and demanded my attention on more than one occasion recently, so I have and am advising you to do something else other than trying to engage me in an edit war with imagined rules. There is simply no good reason for you to be sucking joy out of contributing here. Sincerely, Cygnis insignis (talk) 15:46, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Cygnis insignis: You have not responded to my question. I will revert you again if you do not justify your edits. As I have said, the page breaks are needed for export, and the formatting you have given is incomplete. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 15:49, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
 * I've explained why I haven't responded: you are edit warring instead making a positive contribution elsewhere. Cygnis insignis (talk) 15:53, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Cygnis insignis: I haven’t asked you to explain your lack of responsiveness; I have asked you only to respond. If you do not respond, I will revert your edits, because they are, in my view, wrong. I have asked you to respond and explain why you believe your edits are correct; but if you do not, there is no reason to maintain the older revision, because I only understand my reasoning for reverting your edits, and not your reason for reverting mine. To the extent that “do something else” (or “contribut[e] elsewhere”) is your justification, it is fallacious; Wikisource is a collaborative project, and one cannot claim exclusive dominion over workspace. As I have noticed that the formatting was incomplete, and that there were no page breaks on this page where there should be several, I fixed those problems; and you cannot revert them and demand my absence to justify reversions. I will not revert immediately, pending further discussion; but, that failing, I will revert. As an additional note, please remove the copy of this discussion which you added to my talk page; it does not need to be duplicated, as it is relevant only to this page. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 16:55, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Cygnis insignis: I notice your comment on my talk page. That alone, of all the comments here, is appropriately placed there, as it is a personal attack unrelated to this index. I again request that you remove the duplicated discussion from my talk page. You impute to me desires I do not have. I don’t care about you. I was interested in this work (which I found in “Recent changes”), and sought to correct it for export, &c., as above described. You still have failed to respond to the question I have asked. Your complaint about “‘dominion,’” in reference to a request for discussion, betrays your lack of interest in collaboration—I changed something (without asking for consensus), you reverted that change, and now I try to talk about it. However, you seem uninterested in talking to people; but that does not allow you to keep reverting me. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 20:30, 27 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Cygnis insignis: Absent a response explanatory of your reversions, I will revert tomorrow, unless you truly desire additional time to develop remarks for the discussion. Xover: I notice your comment on the discussion; however, the discussion originated here. It was copied over, for what reason I know not. If you would like to copy over your comment, or make any further comment, please do so here. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 23:36, 29 September 2021 (UTC)