Talk:New Hampshire Constitution

I would like input from more experienced Wikisourcerors: should this page be split into sub-pages (as it was, and still is, see Parts I and II), or should it be kept on one page? To me, it seems to long to be kept on one page. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 01:58, 21 October 2020 (UTC).
 * I don't see value in splitting it into two parts, especially against how the original contributor placed it. It is not as though we would create separate wikidata items, nor that it is problematic to reference, nor too long, nor pushing any expansion or template limits. What are you seeing differently to want to split it? What value would a split have? — billinghurst  sDrewth  03:29, 21 October 2020 (UTC)


 * billinghurst: I thought it was too long, especially with all of the listed sections. That is the main reason I thought it should be split. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 13:39, 21 October 2020 (UTC).
 * Worse, it was a paste over document. Resurrected versions and disambiguated. Size along is not the only issue, and generally we would need a bigger logical reason to split a work. I have produced 100+ pages as a single work, and I have done 20 page works as three, it depends on the work and the logic of a split. — billinghurst  sDrewth  21:45, 21 October 2020 (UTC)