Talk:Document Licenses and the Future of Free Culture

license
The license of the audio is CC-BY-2.5, which presumably means that the speech is contains is permitted under the same license. 193.11.177.69 has removed this tag, but not replaced it with another permission tag -- this leaves the reader unaware that the speech is at the very least covered by CC-BY-2.5.

193.11.177.69, your Wikisource contributions are by default covered by GFDL. Are you happy to dual-license your transcription as GFDL/CC-BY-2.5, or place it into the public domain? John Vandenberg (chat) 12:11, 8 February 2008 (UTC)


 * I don’t think licenses of audio recordings automatically carry over to transcriptions, but IANAL. As to licensing, I prefer GFDL but will accept whatever is necessary to keep the transcriptions here on Wikisource.  --193.11.177.69 19:09, 10 February 2008 (UTC)