Talk:Arthur Rackham: A Bibliography

Copyright registered
I see a copyright registration here for Oct. 2 1936. Have you checked there was no notice on the 1936 original rather than the reprint? I don't see a renewal so I suspect this is PD-no-renewal rather than no notice? MarkLSteadman (talk) 01:29, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
 * (reading commons license poster...) Does that mean it needs to be moved to here?--RaboKarbakian (talk) 01:44, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
 * It is fine to host on Commons since the origin of the work is the US it is PD in the country of origin as well in the US. MarkLSteadman (talk) 01:46, 26 October 2021 (UTC)


 * MarkLSteadman: Assuming the original copyright is legitimate, the original is  and the reprint is  . That can be updated, if necessary. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 02:12, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
 * In general, I am pretty confident than 99% of reprints, 2nd impressions etc. are tagged with the original copyright tags rather than PD-US-no-notice or PD-ineligible. For example White Nights and Other Stories, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, Metamorphoses (Miller), Nicomachean Ethics (Chase), etc. New editions, (and especially under new titles) may be tagged as such but we generally haven't for reprints (maybe we should create a reprint license similar to translation license MarkLSteadman (talk) 09:22, 26 October 2021 (UTC)