Portal talk:Kentigern

Disambiguation
I believe that the works should be split to the sub-parts of the respective original works, each labelled with the template similar, and this page should become a disambig page. -- billinghurst (talk) 03:50, 29 July 2009 (UTC)


 * I'm not now sure of that approach. It seems to me that such "collective" pages serve a decent function. I sent the DNB text to be served up by transclusion, and I imagine the EB 1911 text would be better handled by such a treatment, also. I'm not entirely certain of the way ahead, but I think it should allow for such pages made up of related reference material, whatever the preferred bureaucratic wrapping. Charles Matthews (talk) 08:03, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

✅billinghurst (talk)