Portal:Case law of the United States

Supreme Court of the United States

 * See: Portal:United States Supreme Court

United States Courts of Appeal

 * Storage Technology Corp. v. Custom Hardware Engineering & Consulting, Inc., 431 F.3d 134 (Fed. Cir. 2005)
 * In re African-American Slave Descendents Litigation, 471 F.3d 754 (7th Cir. 2006), aff'g in part and rev'g in part 375 F. Supp. 2d 721 (N.D. Ill. 2005) (dismissing lawsuits seeking reparations from numerous corporations for their alleged complicity in slavery).

United States District Courts

 * See: Portal:United States District Courts

United States Court of Claims

 * Liliuokalani v. The United States 45 Ct. Claims 418 (1910)

United States Tax Court

 * Erhard Seminars Training v. C.I.R. Docket Nos. 6283-75, 9220-76, 6249-78, 820-79, 4857-80, 1408-81. (1986)
 * Est v. C.I.R. Docket Nos. 8043-80, 8998-81. (1986)
 * Meyer v. C.I.R. Docket Nos. 6667-78, 10169-78. (1986)
 * Erhard v. C. I. R. Docket No. 39473-85, 46712-86, 39532-87, 137-88. (1991)
 * Erhard v. C. I. R. Docket Nos. 39473-85, 46712-86, 39532-87, 137-88. (1992)
 * Thorne v. C. I. R. Docket Nos. 15467-80, 29911-85. U.S. Tax Ct (1992)
 * Erhard v. C. I. R. Docket Nos. 39473-85, 46712-86, 39532-87, 137-88. (1993)
 * Erhard v. C.I.R. No. 25656-93. U.S.Tax Ct (1994)
 * Kent Hovind, Petitioner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent (July 6, 2006) Minister Kent Hovind found liable for $500,000 of income tax. Judge dismisses "voluntary tax" claims by petitioner.

Florida

 * The Hovind Bankruptcy Decision (1996) Minister Kent Hovind unsuccessfully filed for bankruptcy to avoid paying federal income taxes. Hovind was found to have lied about his possessions and income.
 * The Riddle Bankruptcy Decision (2006) Chief Judge Emeritus A. Jay Cristol issues an order in a somewhat unusual format.

Illinois

 * In re Adcock, 618 B.R. 260 (Bankr. C.D. Ill 2020). Bank filed fraud and conversion claim against family farmer. Farmer represented by Roy Jackson Dent, III of Dent Law Offices, Ltd., Effingham, Illinois. https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=18078309068556145189&hl=en&lr=lang_en&as_sdt=400006&as_vis=1&oi=scholaralrt&hist=RvSHED0AAAAJ:4212352831542314795:AAGBfm2zMFZVa22iSwTeWgYN9RRojxGFLA&html=

Federal Trade Commission

 * In re Pan-American Mfg. Co., Inc. (1929) Federal Trade Commission prevents Grapico founding line from using the "Grapico" name in trade.

Arkansas
See: Portal:Arkansas case law

California

 * Escola v. Coca Cola Bottling Co. 24 Cal.2d 453 (1944)
 * Drennan v. Star Paving Co., 51 Cal.2d 409 (1958)
 * Greenman v. Yuba Power Products 59 Cal.2d 57 (1963)
 * People v. De Santiago 71 Cal. 2d 18 (1969)

Delaware
See: Portal:Delaware case law

Illinois

 * Hewitt v. Hewitt 77 Ill. 2d 49, 394 N.E.2d 1204 (1979)
 * People v. King 2019 IL 123926 (2019)

Louisiana

 * Morrison v. White, 16 La. Ann. 100 (1861)

Massachusetts

 * Commonwealth v. Kneeland, 20 Pick. 206, 37 Mass. 206 (1838)

Nebraska

 * Nebraska v. Verma J. Harrison (1999)
 * State v. Assad (2020)

New Jersey
See: Portal:New Jersey case law

New York

 * MacPherson v. Buick Motor Co., 217 N.Y. 382, 111 N.E. 1050 (1916)
 * Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co., 248 N.Y. 339, 162 N.E. 99 (1928)
 * Boomer v. Atlantic Cement Co., 26 N.Y.2d 219 (1970)

Pennsylvania
See: Portal:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Virginia

 * Lucy v. Zehmer, 196 Va. 493; 84 S.E.2d 516 (1954)

Arkansas
See: Portal:Arkansas case law

California

 * Wollersheim v. Church of Scientology, 212 Cal.App.3d 872, 66 Cal.Rptr.2d 1 (Cal.App. 2 Dist. 1989)
 * Church of Scientology v. Armstrong, 232 Cal.App.3d 1060, 283 Cal.Rptr. 917 (Cal.App. 2 Dist. 1991)
 * Church of Scientology v. Wollersheim, 42 Cal.App.4th 628, 49 Cal.Rptr.2d 620 (Cal.App. 2 Dist. 1996)
 * Church of Scientology International v. Superior Court, Not Reported in Cal.Rptr.3d (Cal.App. 1 Dist. 2005)

New Jersey
See: Portal:New Jersey case law

Texas

 * City of Dallas v. England, No 3-92-243-CV. Feb. 10, 1993
 * Comptroller of Public Accounts v. Ethical Society of Austin, No. 03-02-00066-CV

Arizona

 * State of Arizona v. James Arthur Ray, Case No. V1300CR201080049, Defendant James Arthur Ray's Response to State's Motion in Limine re: Witness Rick Ross (2011)

California

 * The People of the State of California vs Sylvia Celeste Brown and Kensil Dalzell Brown (1993)
 * The People of the State of California v. Joel Robert Tobias (2001)

Delaware
See: Portal:Delaware case law

Illinois

 * Price v. Philip Morris, Inc. (2003)

Missouri

 * Testimony of William P. Peniston and Adam Black (1838)

New Jersey
See: Portal:New Jersey case law

New York

 * Rutgers v. Waddington (1784)
 * New York v. Joseph Smith (1826)
 * Mayor of Hudson v. Thorne, 7 Paige Ch. 261 (1838)

Pennsylvania

 * Gerard v. Basse, 1 U.S. (1 Dall.) 119 (Phila. Cty. Com. Pl. 1784)
 * Hunter’s Lessee v. Kennedy, 1 U.S. (1 Dall.) 81 (Phila. Cty. Com. Pl. 1784)
 * Gerard v. La Coste, 1 U.S. (1 Dall.) 194 (Phila. Cty. Com. Pl. 1787)
 * Keely v. Ord, 1 U.S. (1 Dall.) 310 (Phila. Cty. Com. Pl. 1788)
 * Graff v. Smith’s Admors., 1 U.S. (1 Dall.) 481 (Phila. Cty. Com. Pl. 1789)
 * Haimes v. Temple University Hospital, 39 Pa. D. & C.3d 381 (1986)