Page:William John Sparrow-Simpson - Roman Catholic Opposition to Papal Infallibility (1909).djvu/216

 196 to that authority, it was "very difficult to suppose that so indubitably and extensively learned a man as Dr Döllinger can be mixed up with so poor and feeble a production." These criticisms were followed by another article, entitled Janus and False Brethren. Here the reviewer fulminates against the writers of Janus.

The general opinion at Rome was that the book was certainly composed by the Munich School, and the immense historical teaching pointed to one individual, known for his life-long familiarity with Papal history. Renewed efforts were made by opponents of Infallibility to induce Döllinger to reside during the Council in Rome. Cardinal Schwarzenberg did all that lay within his power. Strossmayer, one of the most eloquent members of the Council, declared that Döllinger's presence was urgently necessary. Maret, the learned author of the volumes defending a modified Gallican view, entreated Döllinger to overcome his reluctance and render this service to the Church. "Although without official place," wrote Maret, "your knowledge and advice would greatly influence a multitude of unenlightened and undecided minds." Bishop Dupanloup thought much the same.