Page:William Goldsack-The Qurān in Islām (1906).djvu/11

2 a large amount of attention. The many references to these earlier faiths are instructive, and go to show that Muhammad did not so much represent himself as the founder of a new system, as the promulgator of that faith which was held in the beginning by Abraham himself. Muhammad's references to the Jewish and Christian scriptures also go to show that in the Qurān he did not so much claim to supersede those books as to 'confirm' and substantiate them. Verses to this effect may be found all over the Qurān; indeed the most extravagant praise is bestowed upon both Taurat and Injīl, and these books are ever held up as worthy of faith and obedience. It thus becomes a matter for surprise that in spite of this fact, modern Muslims almost invariably speak of the Jewish and Christian scriptures as 'corrupted', and therefore unworthy of serious attention to-day. The reason for this attitude is obvious; for careful comparison of the Christian and Muslim scriptures shows that the Qurān, which claims to 'confirm' the preceding scriptures, in reality differs very much from them. Muhammadans have thus been driven to the expedient of denying the integrity of the Taurat and Injīl in order to explain away this discrepancy. The question as to whether the Qurān has been corrupted since the time when the prophet of Arabia captivated the Arabs by his eloquence, seems never to have been seriously considered by modern Muslims; yet the slightest acquaintance with Arabic history and literature reveals the fact that the present Qurān is far indeed from being a complete and accurate copy of that Qurān which Muhammad taught his follwers. In the following pages we shall proceed to establish this fact from reliable Muslim authorities, and shall show that, in fact, the present Qurān has been so mutilated and corrupted since the time of Muhammad that it can no longer be relied upon as an accurate and complete record of what he taught.