Page:VCH Worcestershire 1.djvu/327

 THE DOMESDAY SURVEY when the leeches had given him over that he learnt, by divine revelation, the cause of his severe illness. On ceasing to pray for the soul of iEthelwig, he recovered in a few days ' without human medicine.' To this notable illustration of medieval, or at least monastic, Christianity one may add the fact that both of these religious houses are suspected with good reason of concocting or altering the charters they produced in support of their rights. In Heming's Cartulary and the Evesham Chronicle we have the stories of the rival houses, and, in spite of certain contradictions, can form a fair idea of the facts of the case. Abbot iEthelwig and bishop Wulfstan had both enjoyed the favour of Harold ; ^ but both, in Mr. Freeman's opinion, ' were among the first prelates in England to submit to the Conqueror.' * It was iEthelwig, however, who secured, we read, ' his lasting favour.' ' The monks of Worcester insist upon his power,* and on their own disadvantage in the disinclination of their saintly Bishop to occupy himself in secular affairs. JEthelwig, they alleged, attracted to himself certain knights and tenants of the Bishop by promis- ing to protect them against the Normans, but ended by defrauding them of their lands. This led to protests from the Bishop, and iEthelwig, though owning at length his rights, retained the lands, they said, till his death. Now these lands, according to them, were two Warwickshire estates, which do not here concern us, and, in Worcestershire, Acton, ' Earesbyri' ;° Bengeworth with several houses in Worcester, Evenlode and Daylesford. Bengeworth will be dealt with separately below ; as to Acton, the monks themselves, in the detailed narrative ® of their losses, made out rather a weak case against iEthelwig's possession, while Domes- day not only ignores their claim (fo. 176), but expressly states that Evesham held it T.R.E. It similarly states, of Evenlode and Dayles- ford, that Evesham had held them, though recognising Worcester's rights (fo. 173). Its evidence, therefore, is dead against the above story that ^thelwig had only obtained these lands after the Norman Conquest. The story told by the monks of Evesham^ was that ^Ethelwig had ac- quired by fair purchase (per dignam pecuniam) all the lands above men- tioned except ' Earesbyri.' ^ But the real battle was over Bengeworth, which formed part, with Hampton by Evesham, of the Bishop's Hundred of Oswaldslow. The first fight for its possession was on the death of abbot ^thelwig (1077). The Evesham story was that these were among the manors acquired by iEthelwig which bishop Odo compelled a great gemot at ' Gildene- « Ibid. V. 759. 3 mj IV, (187 1) 176. istius provincie, cepit ipse abbas multum crescere seculari potentia, eo quod ingenio et calliditate at scientia secularium legutn qua sola studebat cunctos praecelleret.' ^ Estbury in Hallow. * Heming's Cartulary, I. 250-1. ' Evesham Chronicle, p. 97. as having been continuously possessed by Worcester. 253
 * Freeman's Norman Conquest, III. (1875) 55.
 * ' Devicta namque patria hac a Normannis perditisque cunctis melioribus baronibus
 * I can throw no light on the case of this estate, which Domesday (fo. 173^) represents