Page:VCH Northamptonshire 1.djvu/440

 and I virgate of the ree of Brunne [Bourne]. There also Robert son of Edelin' ('Edeline') hide and  virgate of the fee or Clare.

In [Thorpe Waterville] and [(Thorp-)Achurch] Ascelin de Waterville 6 hides and a half of the fee of (Peter)borough.

In Clopton [Clapton] Walter ' i hide and I virgate of the King's fee. There also 3 hides and a half of the fee of (Peter)borough.* There also Ascelin half a hide of the fee of (Peter)borough.*

Wadenhowe [Wadenhoe]. Aubrey ('Al- bricus') de Ver 2 hides and i virgate of the fee of king David. There also Wymunt de Stok(e) I virgate of the fee of (Peter)borough. There also Roger Infans 2 small virgates of the same fee. There also Vivien (' Wivienus ') de Chirchefelde half a hide of the same fee.^ There also Geoffrey de Gunthorp 2 hides of the same fee.

^ Said to have been Walter de ' Graunt- kort ' (Bridges), but styled Walter ' de Clopton ' under Polebrook below. ■* As observed above (p. 362), the first of these holdings had been held in 1086 by Eustace the sheriflF, in capite, while the second was held by him (as 3f^ hides) under the abbot of Peterborough. ^ This must be the half hide 'in Circafeld' (Churchfield in Oundle) which Abbot Turold is recorded to have given to Vivian {Chronicon Petrohurgense, p. 175).
 * Held of the Abbey by 'iElmar' in 1086.

In Catteworthe i hide and a half of the fee of (Peter)borough.*

In PoKEBROC [Polebrook] Robert de Cauz hide and  virgate of the King's fee.* There also Walter de Clopton 2 hides and a half of the fee of (Peter)borough.* There also Roger Marmium hide and  virgate of the same fee.

In Armeston [Armston]. . . " de Burgelay 2 hides and a half of the same fee.'* There also Turkil i hide of the same fee.'* There also Guy (' Wydo ') Maufee i hide of the same fee.'* There also Geoffrey de Gun- thorp two-thirds of half a hide of the same fee.'* There also Tedrick, three-quarters of half a hide of the same fee.'* In Pappele [Papley] i hide.

sheriff) in 1086. sheriff) in 1086. '" These two holdings represent the 3I hides held there of the Abbey by the same Eustace in 1086 (see p. 362 above). " 'Armeston de Burgelay' in MS. '* Domesday only states that the 5 hides at Armston and Kingsthorpe were held of the Abbey by 5 knights. Here we have details of the five holdings, which amount, however, to 5^*^ hides for Armston alone.
 * Held of the Abbey by Eustace (the
 * This had been held by Eustace (the