Page:VCH Buckinghamshire 1.djvu/382

Rh strong churchman, who sent in yearly reports of their repair and general condition to the archdeacon.

One or two inventories of this time show the churches were very poorly furnished. A vivid picture of their general appearance may be gathered from a visitation of 1636, of which an account will be given in its right place ; and as there is no evidence of any sudden change, but only of a general declension, it is probable that they possessed very much the same furniture in 1600. The only articles of value seem to have been a silver ' communion cup ' and cover : the flagon, if it existed, being very often of pewter.

The state of things described in this visitation of 1612 serves to illustrate the sermons of a preacher of the day, Thomas Adams, who was vicar of Wingrave at about this time. He complains that the people ' grudged at every penny ' they were taxed for at levies for church expenses (the justice of this charge is manifested by the gradual decay of the churches), and that they seemed to think it was enough to have bare walls and a cover to keep them from rain ; ' aliquid ornatus is but super- fluous, except it be a cushion and a wainscot seat for a gentleman's better ease,' while ' the greatest preparation usually against some solemn feast is but a little fresh straw under the feet ; the ordinary allowance for hogs in the stye and horses in the stable.' In another place he complains of the unfaithfulness of the churchwardens, who were of course largely responsible for this neglect : ' drunkenness, uncleanness, swearing, profanation of the Sabbath go abroad all the year, and when the visitation comes they are locked up with an omnia bene.' A similar complaint was made a few years later by Dr. John Andrewes, vicar of Beaconsfield, in a letter to the chancellor of Lincoln, where he says that unless church- wardens and sworn men be severely proceeded against according to the canons for their ' wilful, common and execrable perjury,' there would never be any reformation of their misdemeanours. For they usually