Page:VCH Buckinghamshire 1.djvu/347

Rh dated. There are also one or two instances found amongst the institu- tions of vicars appointed for a short time by the rectors of churches under secular patronage ; but only Hanslope seems to have had a per- manent vicarage ordained under the rector.

The numerous suits in the twelfth and thirteenth centuries between the monastic impropriators and the children or successors of their bene- factors are dry enough reading, but they should be of some interest not only to the historian but to the student of human nature. The county of Buckingham has its full share of these records. It would be rash and partial to suppose that in all these cases the laymen were the aggressors and the monks in the right ; but when it became necessary to bring out charters and show the original claim, the monks had generally the advantage. The advowsons of Wendover, Chesham Leicester, Ment- more, Illmer, Filgrave, Mursley, Wyrardisbury, Great Woolstone, were certainly claimed during the thirteenth century by laymen who could not prove their rights ; on the other hand, the abbots of Wooburn and Tewkesbury had to renounce their claims to the churches of Bow Brickhill and Great Marlow.

The abbots of St. Alban's also had a good deal of trouble in con- nexion with their churches in Buckinghamshire, especially Turville. First of all they had a suit with the Morteyns about the advowson of this church ; but it ended happily in 1 276 by a full recognition of the abbot's right. In 1277, however, Archbishop Kilwardby held a special inquiry in the church of High Wycombe as to the title by which so many churches were held ' in proprios usus ' by the monks of St. Alban's, and again Turville was called in question as well as Wingrave. The abbot answered by sending his proctors to appear before the archbishop at Whitchurch ; but they could not get a satisfactory hearing from him, and were even excommunicated. The matter was settled finally at a friendly meeting between the archbishop and the abbot. There were