Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 93.djvu/1427

 PRIVATE LAW 96-17—OCT. 23, 1979

93 STAT. 1395

Private Law 96- 16 96th Congress An Act Oct. 22, 1979 [H.R. 1753]'

For the relief of Seigio and Javier Arredondo.

Be it eruicted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the Sergio and United States of America in Congress assembled, That, in the adminisJavier tration of the Immigration and Nationality Act, Sergio and Javier Arredondo. Arredondo may be classified as children within the meaning of section 101(b)(l)(F) of the Act, upon approval of a petition filed in 8 USC 1101. their behalf by Mr. Rudolph Albores, a citizen of the United States, and his wife, Dolores Albores, a lawfid permanent resident of the United States, pursuant to section 204 of the Act: Provided, That the 8 USC ii54. natural parents or brothers or sisters of the beneficiary shall not, by virtue of such relationship, be accorded any right, privilege, or status under the Immigration and Nationality Act. Approved October 22, 1979.

"

Private Law 96-17 96th Congress An Act Oct. 23, 1979 [H.R. 898]

For the relief of Rodney L. Herold and others.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That each of theRodney L. following-named persons is relieved of all liability to repay the Herold and others, relief. United States the amount which appears beside his name: July 1976—(3) Herold, Rodney L Christiansen, Albert L Goodrich, Edward E August 1976—(2) Butler, Kenneth E Reynard, Allen H September 1976—(1) Fish, Donald D January 1977—(11) Robertson, Steve A Alton, David W Larson, George J Dow, William R Holly, Daniel L Jelinski, Donald E Kocher, Leland Gonsalves, Carl R McGuire, George E Tonkin, Herbert E Nickell, Virgil L

Indebtedness $2,018.25 1,254.50 101.41 1,808.25 1,310.50 1,182.00 2,302.01 1,890.52 1,653.39 1,626.11 1,475.07 1,412.13 797.37 712.07 617.25 435.45 194.03

Such amounts represent overpa5mients of per diem allowances as a result of administrative failures in implementing a regulatory change in the per diem rate by officials of the United States Government against the above-named civilian employees of the Department of the Navy who were performing extended temporary

�