Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 93.djvu/1242

 93 STAT. 1210

Ante, p. 1179.

Report to cCSttees Ante, p. 1167.

Ante, pp. 1179, 1192, 1195.

PUBLIC LAW 96-157—DEC. 27, 1979

"(6) a description of the procedures used to audit, monitor, and evaluate programs or projects to insure that all recipients have complied with the title and that the information contained in the applications was correct; "(7) the number of part D applications or amendments approved by the Administration without recommending substantial changes; "(8) the number of part D applications or amendments in which the Administration recommended substantial changes, and the disposition of such programs or projects; "(9) the number of programs or projects under part D applications or amendments with respect to which a discontinuation, suspension, or termination of payments occurred together with the reasons for such discontinuation, suspension, or termination; "(10) the number of programs or projects under part D applications or amendments which were subsequently discontinued by the jurisdiction following the termination of funding under this title; and "(11) a description of equipment whose cost in the aggregate was $100,000 or more that was purchased in connection with each program or project assisted under part D, and the current use status of such equipment. "(b) Not later than three years after the date of enactment of the Justice System Improvement Act of 1979, the Administrator of the Law Enforcement Assistance Administration, after consultation with the Director of the National Institute of Justice, the Director of the Bureau of Statistics, and the Administrator of the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, with respect to the receipt and compilation of evaluations, statistics, and performance reports required by this title, shall submit to the Committees on the Judiciary of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report. The report shall set forth comprehensive statistics which, together with the Administrator's analysis and findings, shall indicate whether grants made to States or units of local government under parts D, E, and F have made a reasonably expected contribution toward— "(1) improving and strengthening law enforcement agencies, as measured by arrest rates, incidence rates, victimization rates, the number of reported crimes, clearance rates, the number of patrol or investigative hours per uniformed officer, or any other appropriate objective measure; (2) improving the police utilization of community resources through support of joint police-community projects designed to prevent or control neighborhood crime; "(3) disrupting illicit commerce in stolen goods and property; "(4) combating arson; "(5) developing investigations and prosecutions of white-collar crime, organized crime, public-corruption-related offenses, and fraud against the government; "(6) reducing the time between arrest or indictment and disposition of trial; ' (7) increasing the use and development of alternatives to the prosecution of selected offenders; "(8) increasing the development and use of alternatives to pretrial detention that assure return to court and a minimization of the risk of danger; "(9) increasing the rate at which prosecutors obtain convictions against habitual, nonstatus offenders; "(10) developing and implementing programs which provide assistance to victims and witnesses, including restitution by the

�