Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 91.djvu/1425

 PUBLIC LAW 95-188—NOV. 16, 1977 commenced therein, the transaction may not thereafter be attacked in any judicial proceeding on the ground that it alone and of itself constituted a violation of any antitrust laws other than section 2 of the Act of July 2, 1890 (section 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act, 15 U.S.C. 2), but nothing in this Act shall exempt any bank holding company involved in such a transaction from complying with the antitrust laws after the consummation of such transaction,". Approved November 16, 1977,

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY: HOUSE REPORT No. 95-774 (Comm. on Banking, Finance and Urban Affairs). CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, VoL 123 (1977): Oct. 31, considered and passed House. Nov. 1, considered and passed Senate, amended. Nov. 2, House concurred in Senate amendment.

29-194

0 - 8 0

91 STAT. 1391

�