Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 82.djvu/774

 732

PUBLIC LAW 90-483-AUG. 13, 1968

[82 STAT.

Corpus Christi Ship Canal, Texas: Senate Document Numbered 99, Ninetieth Congress, at an estimated cost of $19,042,000; Mouth of the Colorado River, Texas: Senate Document Numbered 102, Ninetieth Congress, at an estimated cost of $8,000,000; Wilson Harbor, New York: House Document Numbered 112, Ninetieth Congress, at an estimated cost of $198,000; Cattaraugus Creek Harbor, New York: House Document Numbered 97, Ninetieth Congress, at an estimated cost of $1,315,000; Hamlin Beach State Park, New York: House Document Numbered 358, Ninetieth Congress, at an estimated cost of $500,000; Forestville Harbor, Michigan: House Document Numbered 183, Ninetieth Congress, at an estimated cost of $538,000; Tawas Bay Harbor, Michigan: House Document Numbered 189, Ninetieth Congress, at an estimated cost of $466,000; Detroit River, Trenton Channel, Michigan: House Document Numbered 338, Ninetieth Congress, at an estimated cost of $31,300,000; Snohomish River (Everett Harbor), Washington: House Document Numbered 357, Ninetieth Congress, at an estimated cost of $1,108,000; Humboldt Harbor and Bay, California: House Document Numbered 330, Ninetieth Congress, at an estimated cost of $2,430,000; Port Hueneme, California: House Document Numbered 362, at an estimated cost of $1,000,000; Ventura Marina, California: House Document Numbered 356, at an estimated cost of $1,540,000; San Diego Harbor, California: House Document Numbered 365, Ninetieth Congress, at an estimated cost of $5,360,000; Kake Harbor, Alaska: Senate Document Numbered 70, Ninetieth Congress, at an estimated cost of $1,760,000; King Cove Harbor, Alaska: Senate Document Numbered 13, Ninetieth Congress, at an estimated cost of $522,000; Sergius and Whitestone Narrows, Alaska: Senate Document Numbered 95, Ninetieth Congress, at an estimated cost of $3,030,000; Coasts of Hawaiian Islands, Harbors for Light Draft Vessels: House Document Numbered 353, Ninetieth Congress, at an estimated cost of $1,256,000. BEACH

EROSION

Brevard County, Florida: House Document Numbered 352, Ninetieth Congress, at an estimated cost of $680,000. SEC. 102. The project for beach erosion control. Fort Pierce, Florida, authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1965 (79 Stat. 1089, 1092) in accordance with the recommendations of the Chief of Engineers in House Document Numbered 84, Eighty-ninth Congress, is hereby modified to provide for construction of the project and periodic nourishment for ten years by the Secretary of the Army, acting through the Chief of Engineers. In addition to applicable requirements oi local cooperation set forth in the aforementioned report of the Chief of Engineers, local interests shall, prior to construction, give assurances satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army that they will— (1) contribute in cash, either in a lump sum prior to initiation of construction or in installments prior to the start of pertinent work items in accordance with construction or nourishment schedules, as determined by the Chief of Engineers, all costs of initial construction and periodic nourishment for ten years exclusive of costs assigned to the Federal Government in the aforementioned recommendations of the Chief of Engineers; and (2) hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works. Marmet, w. va., Q^^ jQS. (a) That section 2 of the Act entitled "An Act authorlzconveyance. mg the Secretary of W a r to sell and convey to the town of Marmet,

�