Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 68 Part 1.djvu/1281

 68

STAT.]

Lubec Channel, Maine: Senate Document Numbered 243, Eightyfirst Congress, at an estimated cost of $74,000; Portsmouth Harbor and Piscataqua River, Maine and New Hampshire: House Document Numbered 556, Eighty-second Congress, at an estimated cost of $952,000; Lynn Harbor, Massachusetts: House Document Numbered 568, Eighty-first Congress, at an estimated cost of $65,000: Provided, That local interests contribute in cash the cost of dredging the easterly three hundred feet of the Municipal Channel to a depth of twenty-two feet, presently estimated to cost $4,700, before the work is undertaken; Weymouth Fore River, Massachusetts: House Document Numbered 555, fiighty-second Congress, at an estimated cost of $4,400,000; Town River, Quincy, Massachusetts: House Document Numbered 108, Eighty-third Congress, at an estimated cost of $525,000; Scituate Harbor, Massachusetts: House Document Numbered 241, Eiffhty-third Congress, at an estimated cost of $375,000; Fall River Harbor, Massachusetts: House Document Numbered 405, Eighty-third Congress, at an estimated cost of $694,000; Bullocks Point Cove, Rhode Island: House Document Numbered 242, Eighty-third Congress, at an estimated cost of $166,400; Sakonnet Harbor, Rhode Island: House Document Numbered 436, Eighty-second Congress, at an estimated cost of $555,400: Provided, That local interests contribute in cash, 4 per centum of the cost of the project, presently estimated as $23,000; Patchogue River, Connecticut: House Document Numbered 164, Eighty-third Congress, at an estimated cost of $135,000; Westport Harbor and Saugatuck River, Connecticut; House Document Numbered 488, Eighty-first Congress, at an estimated cost of $112,500; Westchester Creek, New York: House Document Numbered 92, Eighty-second Congress, at an estimated cost of $32,200; Hudson River, New York: House Document Numbered 228, Eightythird Congress, at an estimated cost of $31,928,000; Shoal Harbor and Compton Creek, New Jersey: House Document Numbered 89, Eighty-second Congress, at an estimated cost of $138,000; Hackensack River, New Jersey: House Document Numbered 252, Eighty-second Congress, at an estimated cost of $1,973,900; Delaware River, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and Delaware: In accordance with the recommendations of the Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors in House Document Numbered 358, Eighty-third Congress, at an estimated cost of $91,389,000; Mispillion River, Delaware: Senate Document Numbered 229, Eighty-first Congress, at an estimated cost of $469,400; Inland Waterway from Delaware River to Chesapeake Bay, Delaware and Maryland: Senate Document Numbered 123, Eighty-third Congress, at an estimated cost of $101,000,000: Provided, That the standard of local contribution for the construction of all bridges, including approaches thereto, required by the project shall be the same standard heretofore applied to the construction of St. Georges Bridge; Queenstown Harbor, Maryland: House Document Numbered 718, Eighty-first Congress, at an estimated cost of $31,900; Little Creek, Kent Island, Queen Anne County, Maryland: House Document Numbered 715, Eighty-first Congress, at an estimated cost of $23,000; Anchorage at Lowes Wharf, Talbot County, Maryland: House Document Numbered 90, Eighty-second Congress, at an estimated cost of $29,000;

39777 O—55—pt. 1-

1249

PUBLIC LAW 7 8 0 - S E P T. 3, 1954

-81

Massachusetts.

Rhode Island.

Connecticut.

New York.

New Jersey.

Delaware.

Maryland.

�