Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 65.djvu/840

 PRIVATE LAW 70—MAY 21, 1951

A28

39 Stat. 889, 890. 8 U.S.C. Sup. IV, §§ 155, 156.

Quota deduction.

STAT.

event the marriage between the above-named persons does not occur within three months after the entry of said Louise Leitzinger and her daugliter, Sandra Mary Lou Leitzinger, they shall be required to depart from the United States and upon failure to do so shall be deported in accordance with the provisions of sections 19 and 20 of the Immigration Act of February 5, 1917 (8 U.S.C. 155, 156). In the event the marriage between the above-named persons shall occur within three months after the entry of said Louise Leitzinger, the Attorney General is authorized and directed to record the lawful admission for permanent residence of said Louise Leitzinger and her daughter, Sandra Mary Lou Leitzinger, as of the date of the payment by them of the required visa fees and head taxes. Approved May 21, 1951.

Private Law 70 May 21, 1951 (H. R. 1823]

[65

CHAPTER

107

AN ACT For the relief of Jose Encarnacion Ortiz.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That, in the administration of the immigration and naturalization laws, Jose Encarnacion Ortiz, an honorably discharged veteran of World W a r II, now a patient at the Birmingham Veterans Facility, Van Nuys, California, shall be held to be lawfully admitted to the United States for permanent residence as of the date of the enactment of this Act, upon payment of the required visa fee and head tax. Upon the granting of permanent residence to such alien as provided for in this Act, the Secretary of State shall instruct the proper quota-control officer to deduct one number from the appropriate quota for the first year that such quota is available. Approved May 21, 1951.

Private Law 71

CHAPTER

109

AN ACT May 22, 1951 [H. R. 588]

William Bergen.

62 Stat. 933. 28 U.S.C. Sup. IV, § 1346. 62 Stat. 971. 28 U.S.C.,Sup.IV, i2401.

To confer jurisdiction upon the District Court for the Territory of Alaska to hear, determine, and render judgment upon certain claims of William Bergen.

Be it ermcted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of AmeHca in Congress assembled, That jurisdiction is hereby conferred upon the District Court for the Territory of Alaska, without regard to the amount in controversy, to hear, determine, and render judgment upon the claims of William Bergen, Fairbanks, Alaska, arising out of injuries allegedly sustained by him on December 21, 1944, while he was a passenger on The Alaska Railroad. Suit hereunder may be instituted pursuant to section 1346 of title 28, United States Code, within one year from the date of enactment of this Act, notwithstanding the fact that such claims arose prior to January 1, 1945, and despite section 2401 of title 28, United States Code; and proceedings in such suit, appeals therefrom, and payment of judgment thereon, if any, shall be had in the same manner as in the case of suits regularly filed under the provisions of section 1346 of title 28, United States Code: Provided, however, That

�