Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 44 Part 2.djvu/625

 SIXTY-NINTH CONGRESSV ~S¤ss. I. Crr. 847: 1926. 585 Shall sti ulate that the signaturesbf a ma‘ori Fof said **•¤•*£jY¤* bodgd of arbitrstion aiixed to their award shall be] codiypetent to b°vniih°•i¤°é¤. ° constitute a validand binding award; · j ·  - l (li} Shall Bx a period from the date of the elppointment of the ,m*’*,§,°,°}w€g_ °°¤¤** arbitrator or arbitrators necmijy to complete e board (as pro- vided for in the—agreement)i within which the said board shall com- (i) sum ax n period from the beginning et uni iiegwdwiain ..:*,**:**;;,*3**** °‘ ’*•·*· which the said board shall make and Ble its award: P, That. mm. thebplarties may agree at any time upon an extension of this .,•{,£i°°‘.,.1'l'°°"°°”‘i°“ (j) Shall provide for the date from » which the award shall °,F‘,,;j§f° °“°· °*°-• become eifective and shall fix the period during which the award shall continue in force; » 0, nm M (lr) Shallprovide that the award of the board of arbitration and am camel the evidence of the  before the board relating thereto, °°°"· when certified under the han ofat leasta majority of the arbi- trators, shall be Bled in the clerk’s omce of the district court of the United States for the district wherein the controversy arose ·or the arbitration was entered into, which district shall be designated in the agreement; and, when so Bled, such awardand proceedings shall con- stitutethe full andcomplete. record of the arbitration; n $1) Shall provide that the award, when so Bled, shall be Bnal ,,,‘§'TT,,'§,,h°§;,l§° x an conclusive upon the parties as to the facts determined by said lm WW- aw(ar<§ alps to théaemehiaiits of thief controversy decided; h ‘ R i I m ‘ provi t tany ` erenoe arxsmg` asto t emeaning °°°¤'°¤ ¤¤ ° or the application of the provisions, of an award made by a board ¤?_;:§¤_l:ztmi:i¤.? iii of arbitration shall be referred back for ia ruling to the same board, ° or, by agreement, to a subcommittee of such board· and that such ruling, when acknowlecg in tbesame manner, and Bled in the same district court clerk’s o, as the original award, shall be a part of and shall have the same force and efect as such original award; and (n) Shall provide that the respecxive parties to the award will b¤::>¤¤¤¤I ¤f ¤w¤r<1 caahhfaithgilly execute the  wh I I d Y ' e sai agreement to i en proper s1gned' an N¤ ¤*¤¤•¤¤¤ w acknowledged as herein provided, shtzll not be reyokedyby a partyto QW b, ° my such agreement: Provided however, Thatsuchagreementtoarbitiate  I M me at any time be revoked and canceled by the written agreement of e•¤¤•l,•tc.apK mail both parties siggied by their duly accredited representatives, and (if '{,Q",$‘g,'@_ '°‘°° ‘° no board of ar itration has yet been constituted underthe agree- ment) delivered to the Board of Mediation or any member thereof; or, if the board of arbitration has been constituted as provided by this Act, delivered to such board of arbitration. i Sac. 9. First. The award of a board of arbitration, having been d°·}g'§t;Q,b•dfjg§,;*g acknowledged as herein provided, shall be Bled in the clerk’s odice coun. of the district court designated in the agreement to arbitrate. Second. An award acknowledged and Bled as herein provided shall dgw _;d"•{,·*},¤Q_{=; be conclusive on the phrties as to the merits and facts of the contre- mwigi moe- pmuou versy submitted to ar itration, and unlem, within ten days after the §Z,,,,°$°,,,§’,°, °,$i:L* li} Bling of the award, a petition to impeach the award one the grounds °°”· hereinafter set forth, shall be Bled in the clerk’s omoeiof the court in which the award has been Bled the court shall enter judgment on the award, which judgment shall be final and conclusive on the parties. Third. Such ition for the impeachment or contestmg` of an GMM-, fw ,¤¤°¤*· award so Bled sm be entertained by the court only on one or mor); gilggglon. i of the following grounds: 4 (a) That the award plainly does not conform to the substantive wggdmg requirements laid down y this Act for such awards, or that the pro- ments emu ae:. ceediugs were not substantially in conformity with this Act;