Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 41 Part 1.djvu/1034

 six*rY-six*rH coiwcnnss. Sess. rr. Ch. 252. 1920. 1013 (3)  a channel three hundred feet wide and thirty feet deep from the turnin§ basin to the southeast corner of east basin; (4) Extension of an Pedro breakwater to a point between the Long Beach Harbor entrance and the sea outlet of the flood diversion channel; (5) Dredging thirty feet deep) and three hundred feet wide the Cerritos Channel from the east asin of the Los Angeles Harbor to the tuming basin of Long Beach Harbor; (6) A uisition of suction dredge and accessories. emma Santa(§arbara Harbor, California; San Luis Obispo Harbor, California. Redwood City Harbor and Creek, California. Monterey Harbor, California. C San1mDiego Harbor, California, from the entrance to the National it e. llvntrance to San Francisco Harbor, Califomia. Islais Creek, San Francisco, California. Klamath River, California. Oakland, Berkeley a.nd.Albany Harbors, California. Tualatin River, Oregon. Oregon Coos Bay Harbor and Isthmus Slough, Oregon. St. Helens, n, with a view to connecting deep water in the Willamette Slo with deep water in the Columbia River, and including an proposal of cooperation by local interests. Nehalem Illiver, Oregon, including removal of submerged rock near the inshore end of south jetty and any proposal for cooperation by local interests. W Columbia River between Chinook, Washington, and the head of °°m”g°°°' Sal1rllkIS1V·V1}d.hi'$gto Shi C al Washml gto e as n p an, n. Duwamish aterway, Seattle Harbor, Washington with a view of widening or deepening, or both widening and deepening, the channel to accommodate present and future commerce. ‘ wm Wrangell Narrows, Alaska, with a view of deepenin the channel M ‘ to accommodate present and future commerce, and tge determination of the relative advantages and practicability of the above improvement of Wrangell Narrows, as compared with the improvement of Dry Straits, recommended in House Document Numbered 68, Sixt —fifth Congress, first session. Wiangell Harbor, Alaska. m Ponce Harbor, Porto Rico. Pm? °°° Harbor of Christiansted, Saint Croix, Virgin Islands, with a view “'¥‘“ "‘°°"·’· of securingrsuitable channel. Rm H on new Sec. 3. hat the last paragraph of section 1 of the River and prgweieegim. Harbor Act approved March 2, 1919, which reads: "N o work shall W,‘§;_‘°· P· ‘““· '°‘ be undertaken upon any new project herein adopted unless the Secretary of War shall be of the opiinion that, based upon the cost at the time of enteringlupon the wor, the project can be completed at a cost not greater t an forty per centum in excess of the estimate of cost gipdthe report upon such project," be, and the same is hereby, repe e. Sec. 4. That the following provisions relating to projects heretofore mfiislmoil P r°]°°” approved and adopted by ongress be enacted: Y mm BU and vaquina Bay and Harbor, Oregon: The Secretary of War is hereby nm-lily, wasn. ’ authorized, in his discretion, in requiring compliance with the condi- ,,,$',§$,'§,0§§,?§§2,,S§§f tions Iprecedent to the prosecution of the project, ado ted in the River Vol. 20. p. 1235. and arbor Act approved March 2, 1919, to credit the local interests with the cost at present (prices of so much of the work performed by the port of Newport an the port of Toledo in the construction of the south jetty and the channe in the inner harbor as, m the opinion