Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 41 Part 1.djvu/1031

 1010 SIXTY—SIXTH CONGRESS. Sess. II. Ch. 252. 1920. the supervision of the Chief of Engineers, for the reservation and maintenance of existing river and harbor works, and) for the (prosecu- P _ tion of such projects heretofore authorized as may be most esirable A§‘},’§f,§’§;,tS_ in the mterests of commerce and navigation: Provided, That allotments from the amount hereby appropriated shall be made by the _ Secretary of War upon the recommendation of the Chief of Engineers: ,,§’,*{f,fg‘Q,§s,f,°§§‘,f,,d§f {watcher, That at til; be fbthe t(l;ird; siéssion of e1x—six n ssasec re s emaeooness by the Secretary 0% ar sli)owing thi; amoimt allotted underglihis _ appropriation for each work for improvement or maintenance. ,,§,,‘j‘;‘,§f‘“*‘°”·’· ““" gmc. 2. That for examinations, s1u·veys,· and contingencies for _ rivers and harbors for which there may be no special a ropriation §°,§§§§§· ,,,,,0,,,, the sum of $400,000 is hereby appropriated: Provided 'lliiat no pre- ¤·¤¤¤‘¢¤· liminaizuexamination, survey, lpgoject, or estimate for new works S other t those designated in t s or some prior Act or joint resolu- ,,,,,}‘,§’}’Q,°§‘,?,'Q§§ "* tion shall be made: Prmnded further, That after the• regular or formal reports made as required by law on any exannnation, survey, project, or work under way or proposed are submitted no su ple- N k th md lmental or additional {eport 0; glstimate slizlldbe rxyil/a‘g;ed1mlmorel%{;d P "°' **1* ° a concurrent reso ution 0 n ess: u r, t mm appmmmd m` tlie Government shall not be deemedlso have entiiged upoii any project for the imprgvement of any waterway or harbor mentioned m this xt ulntil dusdfor the commeingenient of the proposed work shall ve een act y appro riate y aw. m§*§‘ §f°§§{Q Every report submitted) to Congress in pursuance of this section or ‘° 3°°°mP¤¤Y *°P°**S· of any provision of law for a survey hereafter enacted, in addition to other information which the Congress has heretofore directed shall wen, shall contain a. statement of s ecial or local benefit which ' accrue to localities affected by sucg improvement and a state- Loom pmtm mlenit lof general or nagpnlild laenefits,  recommendations fas tg °° ‘ ‘ w a oca coo eration o e re uire an on account 0 suc Pmmm mum special or locaI)benei:it. _ q fe yy _ imtions andy surveys ’l`he Secretary of War IS hereby authorized and directed to cause °“°°°""°‘ preliminary examinations and surveys to be made at the following- Egiiiedggcditiei, and a sufficieng spm tpu pay the cost thereof may be otte rom the amount rovi e in t `s section: M*“-°°- Stockton Harbor, Maine? Shore near the mouth of Saco River, Maine, with a view to prevcntin its erosion. ganisirisgoga lljiveii Maine. oc · an ar or 8.1.116. Massachusetts g?md8nt1?8Hrb0§6 M§4m8' h ° ou ar r, assac usetts. Scitlixiate Harbor, Massachusetts. Eoston Harbor, Massachusetts: South Bay from point of Fort Rhode mud and Point Channel, Federal Street Bridge, to Massachusetts Avenue. ceamtgm. Pawcatuck River, Rhode Island and Connecticut. near the steam oat an at ban. Flushing Bay and Creek, New York. Jamaica Bay, New York, with a view to securing increased depth and width, inc uding the entrance channel. }l`1w§@v(e-f§ot chairqrnel Pegconic Baizly to Jamaica Bay, New York. u n iver, ew or : roac es to Tro Dam. Channel north of Shooters Ilsildnd between Nyew York and New Jersey with a view to removing the Shoal west of Shooters Island to a de th of sixteen feet. N°"°”'°Y· Agsecon Inlet New Jersey. Salem River, New Jersey. Woodbridge Creek, New Jersey.
 * "‘"°’k· Hutxson Rivir, New (Y§§k, wgtih a view to the removal of a shoal