Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 27.djvu/120

 FIFTY-SECON D CONGRESS. Sess. I. Ch. 158. 1892. 93 Improving harbor at the mouth of Black River, Ohio: Continuing nisckmvsnomo. improvement, twenty thousand dollars. Improving harbor at Cleveland, Ohio: Continuing improvement, one Cleveland. ohio. hundred thousand dollars. Improving harbor at Fairport, Ohio: Continuing improvement, thirty- F¤i¤>¤=‘¢· OM-- nve thousand dollars. Improving harbor at Huron, Ohio: Continuing improvement, fifteen H¤r¤¤, Okie thousand dollars. Improving harbor at Sandusky, Ohio: Completing improvement, S¤¤**“¤*Y·°"i°· forty-one thousand seven hundred and twelve dollars, a part of which may be used, in the discretion of the Secretary of War, in removing shoal at outer approach to harbor. Improving harbor at Toledo—straight channel through Maumee T¤1¤¢1<>.0*¤i¤- Bay-Ohio: Continuing improvement, two hundred thousand dollars, a part of which may be nsed, in the discretion of the Secretary of War, in removing shoal in old channel, and in extending the improvement up the Maumee River. Improving harbor at Vermillion, Ohio: For repairs and dredging, V¤¤¤i11i•>¤· 0hi<>· two thousand dollars. Improving Conneaut Harbor, Ohio: For relocation of channel and C·>¤¤•>¤¤*·°'*i°- construction of new piers (Scheme B, of Engineer’s report), forty thou- rm,p.m. sand dollars. Improving harbor at Port Clinton, Ohio: Continuing improvement, Pvrt C1i¤¤>¤.01¤i¤· ten thousand dollars, of which one thousand two hundred dollars areto be paid to Charles Boose, of Oak Harbor, Ohio, in full satisfaction for enum msc. the necessary portion of the sand beach adjoining the inner end of the P¤y¤¤¤¤¤ *··>- west revetment at Port Clinton Harbor, as recommended by the War Department, and in compliance with the settlement authorized by the act of Congress entitled “An act making appropriations for the con- vo. z4,p.s14. struction, repair, and preservation of certain public works on rivers and harbors, and for other purposes/’ approved August fifth, eighteen hundred and eighty-six. Improving outer harbor at Michigan City, Indiana: Continuing im- Mating-m cuy,nn. provement, thirty thousand dollars. Improving inner harbor at Michigan City, Indiana: Completing improvement, fifteen thousand dollars. Improving Calumet Harbor, Illinois: For maintenance of existing C¤1¤¤¤<>¢- Uiworks, fifteen thousand dollars. Improving harbor at Chicago, Illinois: Completing improvement, sev- chicago, n1. enty-two thousand dollars; and the engineer in charge of the harbor is directed, in his next report,to submit what, if any, improvement should be made by the Government, in Chicago River, and the cost of same. Improving harbor at Waukegan, Illinois: Continuing improvement, wruksgm, n1. twenty-five thousand dollars. ‘ Improving harbor at Charlevoix and entrance to Pine Lake, Michi— 0¤¤¤·~>i¤·¤i°h· gan: Continuing improvement, ten thousand dollars. lmproving harbor at Frankfort, Michigan: Continuing improvement rmnkrtmmct. and repairs, ten thousand dollars. Improving harbor at Grand Haven, Michigan: Continuing improve- Gn¤dH¤v¤¤,Mi¤h- ment, ninety thousand dollars. Improving harbor of refuge at Grand Marais, Michigan: Continuing emuammismcn. improvement. thirty thousand dollars. ‘ lmproving harbor at Manistee, Michigan: Continuing improvements m¤s»m,m»1¤. and for repairs, fifty thousand dollars: Provided, That no part of this mm. sum shall be used in aid of the inner navigation until the city authorities, or private owners, have taken proper steps to prevent erosion of P¤·¥¤¤*i¤¤°fl*¤¤k¤- the banks and the washing of silt into the bed of the river. _ Improving harbor at Holland (Black Lake), Michigan: Continuing nouns, men. improvement, five thousand dollars. Improving harbor at Monroe, Michigan: Continuing improvement M¤¤¤>¤·¤¤¤l·· and maintenance, ten thousand dollars.