Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 18 Part 1.djvu/258

 186 Trru: x111.—THE J U D1UIARY.—Ch. 18. 6J¤n·.1800. ¤·4. at the suit of any person, shall be entitled to the same privileges of the S- L "· 2r P· ‘*· yards of the respective jails as persons confined in like cases on process 6819 ¥”¥g182%7§· from the courts of the respective States are entitled to, and under the is! " 'p'like regulations and restrictions. ug., 1842, c. 109, v. 5. p. 499.-Ex parte Wilson, 6 Cr., 52; U. S. v. Knight, 14 Pet., 314. Goodstnkenone Sec. 993. When it is required by the laws of any State that goods Jl""lfl'"""‘· h°“' *1* taken in execution on a writ of rieri facias shall be ap raised, before the sale thereof, the appraisers appointed under the autiiority of the State 2 MM-. 1793. ¢· may appraise goods taken in execution on a iieri facias issued out of any 2`L "· 8r"· lr PSE court of the United States, in the same manner as if such writ had issued Bronson t-. Kin- out of a. court of such State. And the marshal, in whose custody such ¤i<·>. I H¤w·, 323- goods may be, shall summon the appraisers, in the same manner as the sheriff is, by the laws of such State, required to summon them; and if the appraisers, bein duly summoned, fail to attend and perform the duties required of tiem, the marshal may proceed to sell such goods without an appraisement. When such appraisers attend they shall be entitled to the like fees as in cases of appraisements under the laws of the State. Deathofmarshul Sec. 994. When a marshal dies, or is removed from office, or the term § from a court of the L nited States, any lands, tenements, or hereditaments. 7M¤y,1800.¤-45. and before sale or other final disposition thereof, the -like process shall °· 3· "· 2· P- BL issue to the succeeding marshal, and the same proceeding shall be had Doolittle v. Bry- as if such marshal had not died or been removed, or the term of his com- U1, 14 How-.503 mission had not expired. And when a marshal dies or is removed from ofiice, or the term of his commission expires, after he has sold any lands, tenements, or hereditameuts, under process from a court of the United States, and before a deed for the same is executed by him to the purchaser, such court may, on application by the purchaser, or by the plaintiff at whose suit the sale was made, setting forth the case and the reason why the title was not perfected by said marshal, order the marshal for the time being to perfect the title and execute a deed to the purchaser, upon his paying the purchase-money and costs remaining unpaid. M¤¤¢Y¤P¤ldi¤¢¤ Sec. 995. All moneys ard into any court of the United States, or m'jv"éewh‘T{;d“"d received by the officers tlilereof, in any cause pending or adjudicated in W-. such court, shall be forthwith deposited with t rc Treasurer, an assistant 2* M'?-· l87l·1°· treasurer, or a designated depositary of the United States, in the name 2* " 1* l' 17* p'and to the credit of such court: Provided, That nothing herein shall be construed to prevent the delivery of any such money u on security. according to reenrent of parties, under the direction of the court. H_¤Wm0¤¤y¤_d€· Sec. 996. 1%% money deposited as aforesaid shall be withdrawn except “’ b""'“h' by order of the judge or judges of said courts respectively, in term or in ___ C*—T.-. vacation, to be signed by such judge or judges, and to be entered and 2 2* §‘*f'·i}8’l·1°~ certified of record by the clerk; and every such order shall state the ’ S‘ " l` ‘ P` ‘ cause in or on account of which it is drawn. PROCEDURE ON ERROR Axrr APPEAL. R•·¤wv¤l of Sec. 997. There shall be annexed to and returned with any writ of h?' W"' "f error for the removal of a cause, at the day and place therein mentioned, .?4;T—i§).; an authenticated transcript of the record, an assignment of errors, and 20, S. 221 vj1,p_h4_ a prayer for reversal, with a citation to the adverse party. 5 Feb., 1867, c. 28, s. 2, v. 14, p. 386. The writ: Wood r. Lyde, 4 Cr. 180; U. S. 1:. Hodge, 3 How., 534; U.  1·. Villabolos, 6 1-low., 81; U. S. v. Curry, 6 How., 112; Brooks v. Norris, 11 How., 204; Steamer Virginia. s. West; 19 How., 182; Insurance Company r·. Mordecai, 21 How., 200; Overton er. Cheek, 22 How., 46; Castro z-. U. S., 3 Wall., 46; Mussina v. Cavuos, 6 Wall., 355; Bartemeyer v. Iowa, 14 Wall., 20; Storm c. U. S., 94 U. S., 76; Hurst r. Hollingsworth, 94 U. S., 111; Daayton v._Lash, 94 I'. S. 112. _ _ ranscrrpt: Owens 1:. lianney, 9 Cr., 180; Wrllrams v. Norris, 12 Wh., 117; Stockton, v. Bishop, 4 How., 155; Innenrity v. Byrne, 5 How., 295; Villabolos v. U. S., 6 How., 81; Steamer Virginia v. West, 19 How., 182; U. S. v. Gomez, 1 Wall., 690; Sparrow v. Strong, 3 Wall., 103; Stearns v. U. S., 4 Wall., 1; Edmonson r. Bloomshirc, 7 \\ all., 306;
 * 9** l°VY °' 1****** of his commission expires, after he has taken in execution, under process