Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 18 Part 1.djvu/182

 1].0 Trrmc xm.——T1-IE J UD1CIARY.——Ch. 7. gse, Sec. 638. Courts always open for certain pur- 647. Removal of suits where parties claim poses. land under titles from different 639. Removal of suits against aliens, States. &c., where amount of $500 in dis- 648. Issues of fact; when to he tried by ute. · ury. 640. Rgmoval of suits against corporations 649. Issues of fact  by_the_court. organized underalaw oi the United 650. Dityision ol;} opinion in ci&:il causes; States. ecision y presi mgjudge. 641. Removal of causes against persons 651. Division of opinionincriminal causes; denied any civil right, &c. certihcate. _ _ _ _ 642. When petitioner is in actual custody ‘ 652. Division of opinion in civil causes; of State court. I certificate. _ 643. Removal of suits and prosecutions 653. Business of the circuit court for the against revenue officers and officers twodistricts of Missouri transferred, acting under registration laws. how. _ 644. Removal of suits by alien in a par- 654. Process issued out of former circuit ticular case. court for Missouri. 645. When copies of records are refused by I 655. Transfer oficasestgctween eastern and c erk o state court. western nstric. 646. Attachments, injunctions,and indem-, 656. Custody of books, papers, &c., of cirnity bonds to remain in force after g cuit court of Missouri. removal. 657. Cimuitxcougt {lor sputhterln district of . ew or, ow mn. Jurisdiction- Sec. 629. The circuit courts shall have original gurisdiction as follows: A,,,,,,,; c;,,;,,,,, First. Of all suits of a civil nature at common aw or in equity, where of different States. the matter in dispute, exclusive of costs, exceeds the sum or value of five hundred dollars, and an alien is a party, or the suit is between a citizen 20, ,,_ 1,, ,,f1,,,_ $8: of the State where it is brouglht and acitizen of another State: Promded, 3Ma:-.,1875,c.137, That no circuit court shall ave cognizance of any suit to recover the M- L2: 31v-l8»1>P· contents of any promissory note or other chose in action in favor of an 47°""3·"E"‘°"Y ”· assignee, unless a suit might have been prosecuted in such court to recover Greenough,3Dall. . . . . 369; B;,, hm, ,,f the said contents 1f no assignment had been made, except In cases of Cabot,3 I§al1.,382; foreign bills of exchange. Tumerv. Enrille, 4 Dall., 7; Turner:-. Bank of North America, 4 Dall., 8; Mossman 1·. Hi inson, 4 Dall., 12; Abercrombie 1:. Dupuis, 1 Cr., ‘343; Hepburn 1:. Ellze, 2 Cr., 445$gStrawbridge v. Curtiss, 3 Cr., 267; Mantalet 1-. Murray, 4 Cr.,46; Chappel Delnine 11. Dechenaux,4Cr., 306; Pollard 1:. Dwight, 4 (‘r., 421; Brown 1-. Strode, 5 Cr., 306; Sere 1-. Pitto, 6 Cr.,332; New Orleans 1.:. Winter, 1 Wh., 91; Morgan’s Heirs 1-. Morglan, 2 Wh., 290; Cameron 1:. McRoberts, 3 Wh., 593; Young 1:. Bryan, 6 Wh., 146; Worm e 1-. Wormley, 8 Wh., 422; Childress 1:. Emery, 8Wh., 642; Gracie 1:. Palmer, 8 Wh., 699; Mollan 1-. Torrance, 9 Wh., 537; McDonald 1:. Smally, 1 Pet., 320; Jackson 1:. Twentyman, 2 Pet., 136; Bank of Kentucky 1:. Wister, 2 Pet., 318; Connolly 1-. Taylor, 2 Pet., 556; Buckner 1-. Einley, 2 Pet., 586; Battier v. Hine, 7 Pet., 252; Breedlove v. Nicolet, 7 Pet. 413; Dunn 1-. Clark, 8 Pet., 1; Boyce':1 Executors 1:. Grundy, 9 Pet., 275; Livingston 1:.` Story, 11 Pet., 351; Clarke v. Matthewson, 12 Pet., 164; Toland 1:. Sprague, 13 Pet., 300, 327; Bank of Augusta v. Farle, 13 Pet., 519; Bank of Vickshurgh 1:. Slocomb, 14 Pet., 60; Irvine 1:. Lowry, 14 Pet., 293; Levy v. Fitzpatrick, 15 Pet., 171; Gordon 1:. Lon est, 16 Pet., 97; McNutt v. Bland, 2 How., 9; Gwyn 1:. Breedlove, 2 How., 19; Louisville Railroad Company v. Letson, 2 How., 497; Gwyn 1:. Barton, 6 How., 7; Bank of United States 1:. Moss, 6 How., 31; Shelton 1:. Tidin, 6 ow., 163; Smith 1:. Kernochen, 7 How., 198; Sheldon 1:. Sill, 8 How., 441; Shelby 1-. Bacon, 10 How., 56; Chaffee 1-. Hayward, 12 How., 208; Coffee 1:. Planter': Bank, 13 How., 183; Hatf v. Hutchinson, 14 How. 586; Marshall 1:. Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company, 16 How., 314; Herndon 1:. Ridgway, 17 How., 424; Jones 1:. Leaiie, 18 How., 76; fayette Insurance Company 1:. French, 18 How., 404; Union Ban 1:. Vaiden, 18 How., 503; Jones 1:. McMaste1s, 20How., 8; Hyde 1:. Stone, 20 How., 175; Chaffee 1:. Haywood, 20 How., 208; Covington Drawbridge Com any v. She herd, 20 How., 227; hyte 1:. Gibbes, 20 How., 541; Irvine 1:. Marshall, 20 How. 565; Cbvington Drawbridg;Company 1:. Shepherd, 21 How., 122; White 1-. Railroad, 21 i-Iow.,575; Barber 1:. Bar r, 21 How., 582; Green's Administratrix 1:. Creighton, 23 How., 90; Eberly 1:. Moore, 24 How., 147; Fitch 1:. Creighton, 24 How., 159; Igreeman 1-. Howe, 24 How., 460; Railroad 1:. Wheeler, 1 Bl., 286; Minnesota Company v. Saint Paul Company, 2 Wall., 609; De Sobry v. Nicholson, 3 Wall., 420; Barney v. Baltimore City,6 Wall., 287; Cowles v. Mercer County, 7 Wall., 118; Pa ne 1-. Hook, 7 Wall., 425; Bradly v. Rhine’s Administrator, 8 Wall., 393; Bushnell 1:. K}ennedy, 9 Wall., 387; Homthall 1-. Collector, 9 Wall., 566; Reilly 1:. Golding, 10 Wall., 56; Jones v. Andrews, 10 Wall., 327; Pennsylvania 1:. Quicksilver Company, 10 Wall., 556; Coal Com any 1-. Blatchford, 11 Wall., 172; 1nsuranceCompany v. Francis, 11 Wall., 210; Rice 1:. Houston, 13 Wall., 66; Railway Company 1:. W itton, 13 Wall., 270; Christmas 1:. Russell, 14 Wall., 69; Cit of Iexin - ton v. Butler, 14 Wall., 282; Horn v. Lockhart, 17 Wall., 570; M·artiu v. Taylhr, 1 Wash. C. C., 1; Gale 1:. Babcock, 4 Wash. C. C., 199, 344; Bobyshall 1:. 0 penheimer 4 Wash. C. C., 482; United States v. Ravara, 2 Dall., 297; Saint Luke‘s I·i)ospital 1:. Barcla, 3 Blatch., 259; Graham 1:. Stucken, 4 Blatch., 50; Barr v. Simpson Bald., 543; Hatch v. Don-, 4 Mclean, 112; Tliaxter 1:. Hatch, 6 McLean, 68; Bradford 1:. llenks, 2 McLean, 130;