Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 124.djvu/4357

 124 STAT. 4331 PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 Stat. 1574; 10 U.S.C. 426 note) is amended by striking ‘‘National Foreign Intelligence Program (NFIP), Joint Military Intelligence Program (JMIP), and Tactical Intelligence and Related Activities Program (TIARA)’’ and inserting ‘‘National Intelligence Program (NIP) and a Military Intelligence Program (MIP)’’. (b) ADDITIONAL AUTHORIZED ATTENDEES.—Section 426(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph: ‘‘(4) Each Secretary of a military department may designate an officer or employee of such military department to attend the proceedings of the Council as a representative of such military department.’’. SEC. 923. REPORT ON DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE INTERSERVICE MANAGEMENT AND COORDINATION OF REMOTELY PILOTED AIRCRAFT SUPPORT OF INTELLIGENCE, SURVEILLANCE, AND RECONNAISSANCE. (a) REPORT REQUIRED.— (1) REPORT TO SECRETARY OF DEFENSE BY CHIEFS OF STAFF.—Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Chief of Staff of the Army, the Chief of Naval Operations, and the Chief of Staff of the Air Force shall jointly submit to the Secretary of Defense a report, in accordance with this section, on remotely piloted aircraft (RPA) support of intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) within their respective Armed Forces. (2) TRANSMITTAL TO CONGRESS.—Not later than 30 days after the receipt of the report required by paragraph (1), the Secretary shall transmit the report, together with the assess- ment and any recommendations of the Secretary (including the matters required pursuant to subsection (b)(2)), to the congressional defense committees. (b) ELEMENTS.—The report required by subsection (a) shall include the following: (1) In the case of the report required by subsection (a)(1), a description by each chief of staff referred to in that subsection of— (A) current and planned remotely piloted aircraft inventories to support intelligence, surveillance, and recon- naissance requirements over the period 2011 to 2020, including an identification of systems each Armed Force considers organic and the systems capable of providing theater-level support to the commanders of the combatant commands; (B) policy and processes of each Armed Force for coordi- nating investments in remotely piloted aircraft to meet joint force requirements for intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance and to eliminate unnecessary duplication in both development and capability; and (C) the current employment of remotely piloted aircraft by each Armed Force, including the number of remotely piloted aircraft deployed in support operations, the number of remotely piloted aircraft assigned for training, and the number of remotely piloted aircraft warehoused, the capacity of each Armed Force to process, exploit, and disseminate intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance data collected, and the extent to which assets are provided Assessment. Recommenda- tions.