Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 124.djvu/3489

 124 STAT. 3463 PUBLIC LAW 111–320—DEC. 20, 2010 (G) by inserting after subparagraph (F), as redesig- nated by subparagraph (C) of this paragraph, the following: ‘‘(G) effective practices and programs to improve activi- ties such as identification, screening, medical diagnosis, forensic diagnosis, health evaluations, and services, including activities that promote collaboration between— ‘‘(i) the child protective service system; and ‘‘(ii)(I) the medical community, including providers of mental health and developmental disability services; and ‘‘(II) providers of early childhood intervention serv- ices and special education for children who have been victims of child abuse or neglect;’’; (H) by inserting after subparagraph (H), as redesig- nated by subparagraph (C) of this paragraph, the following: ‘‘(I) effective collaborations, between the child protec- tive system and domestic violence service providers, that provide for the safety of children exposed to domestic violence and their nonabusing parents and that improve the investigations, interventions, delivery of services, and treatments provided for such children and families;’’; (I) in subparagraph (J), as redesignated by subpara- graph (C) of this paragraph, by striking ‘‘low income’’ and inserting ‘‘low-income’’; (J) by inserting after subparagraph (J), as redesignated by subparagraph (C) of this paragraph, the following: ‘‘(K) the impact of child abuse and neglect on the incidence and progression of disabilities; ‘‘(L) the nature and scope of effective practices relating to differential response, including an analysis of best prac- tices conducted by the States; ‘‘(M) child abuse and neglect issues facing Indians, Alaska Natives, and Native Hawaiians, including providing recommendations for improving the collection of child abuse and neglect data from Indian tribes and Native Hawaiian communities;’’; (K) in subparagraph (N), as redesignated by subpara- graph (C) of this paragraph, by striking ‘‘clauses (i) through (xi) of subparagraph (H)’’ and inserting ‘‘clauses (i) through (x) of subparagraph (O)’’; and (L) in subparagraph (O), as redesignated by subpara- graph (C) of this paragraph— (i) in clauses (i) and (ii), by inserting ‘‘and neglect’’ after ‘‘abuse’’; (ii) in clause (v), by striking ‘‘child abuse have’’ and inserting ‘‘child abuse and neglect have’’; (iii) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of clause (ix); (iv) by redesignating clause (x) as clause (xi); (v) by inserting after clause (ix), the following: ‘‘(x) the extent to which reports of suspected or known instances of child abuse or neglect involving a potential combination of jurisdictions, such as intra- state, interstate, Federal-State, and State-Tribal, are being screened out solely on the basis of the cross- jurisdictional complications; and’’; and