Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 124.djvu/2677

 124 STAT. 2651 PUBLIC LAW 111–258—OCT. 7, 2010 inform or improve the security of a State, local, or tribal government, (including a State, local, or tribal law enforce- ment agency) or a private sector entity; and’’; (B) in paragraph (6)(C), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end; (C) in paragraph (7), by striking the period at the end and inserting a semicolon and ‘‘and’’; and (D) by adding at the end the following: ‘‘(8) compile an annual assessment of the ITACG Detail’s performance, including summaries of customer feedback, in preparing, disseminating, and requesting the dissemination of intelligence products intended for State, local and tribal govern- ment (including State, local, and tribal law enforcement agen- cies) and private sector entities; and ‘‘(9) provide the assessment developed pursuant to para- graph (8) to the program manager for use in the annual reports required by subsection (c)(2).’’. (c) INTERAGENCY THREAT ASSESSMENT AND COORDINATION GROUP ANNUAL REPORT MODIFICATION.—Subsection (c) of section 210D of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 124k) is amended— (1) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘, in consultation with the Information Sharing Council,’’; (2) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end; (3) in paragraph (2), by striking the period at the end and inserting a semicolon and ‘‘and’’; and (4) by adding at the end the following: ‘‘(3) in each report required by paragraph (2) submitted after the date of the enactment of the Reducing Over-Classifica- tion Act, include an assessment of whether the detailees under subsection (d)(5) have appropriate access to all relevant information, as required by subsection (g)(2)(C).’’. SEC. 6. PROMOTION OF ACCURATE CLASSIFICATION OF INFORMATION. (a) INCENTIVES FOR ACCURATE CLASSIFICATIONS.—In making cash awards under chapter 45 of title 5, United States Code, the President or the head of an Executive agency with an officer or employee who is authorized to make original classification decisions or derivative classification decisions may consider such officer’s or employee’s consistent and proper classification of information. (b) INSPECTOR GENERAL EVALUATIONS.— (1) REQUIREMENT FOR EVALUATIONS.—Not later than Sep- tember 30, 2016, the inspector general of each department or agency of the United States with an officer or employee who is authorized to make original classifications, in consulta- tion with the Information Security Oversight Office, shall carry out no less than two evaluations of that department or agency or a component of the department or agency— (A) to assess whether applicable classification policies, procedures, rules, and regulations have been adopted, fol- lowed, and effectively administered within such depart- ment, agency, or component; and (B) to identify policies, procedures, rules, regulations, or management practices that may be contributing to per- sistent misclassification of material within such depart- ment, agency or component. (2) DEADLINES FOR EVALUATIONS.— Deadline. 50 USC 435 note. Assessment. Assessment.