Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 123.djvu/2866

 123STA T . 2 846PUBLIC LA W 111 – 8 5—O CT. 28 , 2 0 0 9condu c ti n g d e t a i l ed s tudies , and p lans and speci f ications, of suc h p r o j ects ( including those in v olving participation byS tates, local govern m ents, or private groups ) authori z ed or made eligible for selection by la w (but such detailed studies, and plans and specifica - tions, shall not constitute a commitment of the G overnment to construction) , 031 ,000,000, to remain available until e x pended; of which such sums as are necessary to cover the F ederal share of construction costs for facilities under the D redged M aterial Dis- posal Facilities program shall be derived from the H arbor Mainte- nance T rust Fund as authorized by P ublic L aw 10 4– 303; and of which such sums as are necessary to cover one-half of the costs of construction, replacement, rehabilitation, and expansion of inland waterways projects (including only C hic k amauga Lock, Tennessee; K entucky Lock and Dam, Tennessee R iver, Kentucky; Lock and Dams 2, 3, and 4 Monongahela River, Pennsylvania; Markland Locks and Dam, Kentucky and I ndiana; O lmsted Lock and Dam, Illinois and Kentucky; and E msworth Locks and Dam, Ohio River, Pennsylvania) shall be derived from the Inland W aterways Trust Fund
 * $2
 * Provide

d, That $1, 5 00,000 of the funds appropriated under this heading in title I of division C of the Omnibus A ppropriations Act, 200 9 (Public Law 111– 8 .6 01–609) is transferred to the Investigations account and, in addition to funds appropriated by this Act, applied toward the cost of carrying out the Seven Oaks Water Conservation Study, California: Provided fu r th er, That the Chief of Engineers is directed to use $12,594,000 of the funds appropriated herein for the Dallas Floodway Extension, Texas, project, including the Cadillac Heights feature, generally in accord- ance with the Chief of Engineers report dated December 7, 1999: Provided further, That the Chief of Engineers is directed to use $1,417,000 of funds available for the Greenbrier B asin, Marlinton, West V irginia, Local Protection Project to continue engineering and design efforts, execute a project partnership agreement, and initiate construction of the project substantially in accordance with Alternative 1 as described in the Corps of Engineers Final Detailed Project Report and Environmental Impact Statement for Marlinton, West Virginia Local Protection Project dated September 2008: Pro - vided further, That the Federal and non-Federal shares shall be determined in accordance with the ability-to-pay provisions pre- scribed in section 103(m) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, as amended: Provided further, That the Chief of Engi- neers is directed to use $4,000,000 of the funds appropriated herein for planning, engineering, design or construction of the Grundy, Buchanan County, and Dickenson County, Virginia, elements of the Levisa and Tug Forks of the Big Sandy River and U pper Cumberland River Project: Provided further, That the Chief of Engi- neers is directed to use $2,750,000 of the funds appropriated herein to continue planning, engineering, design or construction of the Lower Mingo County, Upper Mingo County, Wayne County, McDowell County, West Virginia, elements of the Levisa and Tug Forks of the Big Sandy River and Upper Cumberland River Project: Provided further, That the Secretary of the Army, acting through the Chief of Engineers, is directed to use $9,500,000 of the funds appropriated herein for the Clover Fork, City of Cumberland, Town of Martin, Pike County (including Levisa Fork and Tug Fork Tribu- taries), Bell County, Harlan County in accordance with the Draft Detailed Project Report dated J anuary 2002, Floyd County, Martin County, Johnson County, and Knox County, Kentucky, detailed
 * 123 Stat