Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 118.djvu/3515

 118 STAT. 3485 PUBLIC LAW 108–451—DEC. 10, 2004 (58) UV DECREED WATER RIGHTS.—The term ‘‘UV decreed water rights’’ means the right to divert water for use on UV decreed acres in accordance with the Globe Equity Decree. (59) UV IMPACT ZONE.—The term ‘‘UV impact zone’’ has the meaning given the term in subparagraph 2.47 of the UVD agreement. (60) UV SUBJUGATED LAND.—The term ‘‘UV subjugated land’’ has the meaning given the term in subparagraph 2.50 of the UVD agreement. (61) UVD AGREEMENT.—The term ‘‘UVD agreement’’ means the agreement among the Community, the United States, the San Carlos Irrigation and Drainage District, the Franklin Irrigation District, the Gila Valley Irrigation District, Phelps Dodge, and other parties located in the upper valley of the Gila River, dated September 2, 2004. (62) UV SIGNATORIES PARTIES.—The term ‘‘UV signatories’’ means the parties to the UVD agreement other than the United States, the San Carlos Irrigation and Drainage District, and the Community. (63) WATER OM&R FUND.—The term ‘‘Water OM&R Fund’’ means the Gila River Indian Community Water OM&R Trust Fund established by section 208. (64) WATER RIGHT.—The term ‘‘water right’’ means any right in or to groundwater, surface water, or effluent under Federal, State, or other law. (65) WATER RIGHTS APPURTENANT TO NEW MEXICO 381 ACRES.—The term ‘‘water rights appurtenant to New Mexico 381 acres’’ means the water rights— (A) appurtenant to the 380.81 acres described in the decree in Arizona v. California, 376 U.S. 340, 349 (1964); and (B) appurtenant to other land, or for other uses, for which the water rights described in subparagraph (A) may be modified or used in accordance with that decree. (66) WATER RIGHTS FOR NEW MEXICO DOMESTIC PURPOSES.— The term ‘‘water rights for New Mexico domestic purposes’’ means the water rights for domestic purposes of not more than 265 acre-feet of water for consumptive use described in paragraph IV(D)(2) of the decree in Arizona v. California, 376 U.S. 340, 350 (1964). (67) 1994 BIOLOGICAL OPINION.—The term ‘‘1994 biological opinion’’ means the biological opinion, numbered 2–21–90–F– 119, and dated April 15, 1994, relating to the transportation and delivery of Central Arizona Project water to the Gila River basin. (68) 1996 BIOLOGICAL OPINION.—The term ‘‘1996 biological opinion’’ means the biological opinion, numbered 2–21–95–F– 462 and dated July 23, 1996, relating to the impacts of modi- fying Roosevelt Dam on the southwestern willow flycatcher. (69) 1999 BIOLOGICAL OPINION.—The term ‘‘1999 biological opinion’’ means the draft biological opinion numbered 2–21– 91–F –706, and dated May 1999, relating to the impacts of the Central Arizona Project on Gila Topminnow in the Santa Cruz River basin through the introduction and spread of non- native aquatic species. VerDate 11-MAY-2000 13:54 Nov 10, 2005 Jkt 029194 PO 00000 Frm 00019 Fmt 6580 Sfmt 6581 C:\STATUTES\2004\29194PT4.001 APPS10 PsN: 29194PT4

�