Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 118.djvu/2163

 118 STAT. 2133 PUBLIC LAW 108–375—OCT. 28, 2004 ‘‘SEC. 2913. FINAL SELECTION CRITERIA FOR ADDITIONAL ROUND OF BASE CLOSURES AND REALIGNMENTS. ‘‘(a) FINAL SELECTION CRITERIA.—The final criteria to be used by the Secretary in making recommendations for the closure or realignment of military installations inside the United States under this part in 2005 shall be the military value and other criteria specified in subsections (b) and (c). ‘‘(b) MILITARY VALUE CRITERIA.—The military value criteria are as follows: ‘‘(1) The current and future mission capabilities and the impact on operational readiness of the total force of the Depart ment of Defense, including the impact on joint warfighting, training, and readiness. ‘‘(2) The availability and condition of land, facilities, and associated airspace (including training areas suitable for maneuver by ground, naval, or air forces throughout a diversity of climate and terrain areas and staging areas for the use of the Armed Forces in homeland defense missions) at both existing and potential receiving locations. ‘‘(3) The ability to accommodate contingency, mobilization, surge, and future total force requirements at both existing and potential receiving locations to support operations and training. ‘‘(4) The cost of operations and the manpower implications. ‘‘(c) OTHER CRITERIA.—The other criteria that the Secretary shall use in making recommendations for the closure or realignment of military installations inside the United States under this part in 2005 are as follows: ‘‘(1) The extent and timing of potential costs and savings, including the number of years, beginning with the date of completion of the closure or realignment, for the savings to exceed the costs. ‘‘(2) The economic impact on existing communities in the vicinity of military installations. ‘‘(3) The ability of the infrastructure of both the existing and potential receiving communities to support forces, missions, and personnel. ‘‘(4) The environmental impact, including the impact of costs related to potential environmental restoration, waste management, and environmental compliance activities. ‘‘(d) PRIORITY GIVEN TO MILITARY VALUE.—The Secretary shall give priority consideration to the military value criteria specified in subsection (b) in the making of recommendations for the closure or realignment of military installations. ‘‘(e) EFFECT ON DEPARTMENT AND OTHER AGENCY COSTS.— The selection criteria relating to the cost savings or return on investment from the proposed closure or realignment of military installations shall take into account the effect of the proposed closure or realignment on the costs of any other activity of the Department of Defense or any other Federal agency that may be required to assume responsibility for activities at the military installations. ‘‘(f) RELATION TO OTHER MATERIALS.—The final selection cri teria specified in this section shall be the only criteria to be used, along with the force structure plan and infrastructure inventory referred to in section 2912, in making recommendations for the

�