Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 114 Part 5.djvu/260

 114 STAT. 2763A-220 PUBLIC LAW 106-554—APPENDIX D "(36) HOOD RIVER, OREGON. —Water transmission infrastructure, Hood River, Oregon. "(37) MEDFORD, OREGON. — Sewer collection infrastructure, Medford, Oregon. "(38) PORTLAND, OREGON. —Water infrastructure and resource protection, Portland, Oregon. "(39) COUDERSPORT, PENNSYLVANIA. —Sewer system extensions and improvements, Coudersport, Pennsylvania. "(40) PARK CITY, UTAH.— Water supply infrastructure. Park City, Utah.". (b) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR TECHNICAL, PLAN- NING, AND DESIGN ASSISTANCE.— Section 219(d) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4836) is amended by striking "$5,000,000" and inserting "$30,000,000". (c) MODIFICATION OF AUTHORIZATIONS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECTS.—Section 219 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 106 Stat. 3757; 113 Stat. 334) is amended— (1) in subsection (e)(6) by striking "$20,000,000" and inserting "$30,000,000 "; (2) in subsection (f)(4) by striking "$15,000,000" and inserting "$35,000,000 "; (3) in subsection (f)(21) by striking "$10,000,000" and inserting "$20,000,000 "; (4) in subsection (f)(25) by striking "$5,000,000" and inserting "$15,000,000 "; (5) in subsection (f)(30) by striking "$10,000,000" and inserting "$20,000,000 "; (6) in subsection (f)(43) by striking "$15,000,000" and inserting "$35,000,000 ". (d) ADDITIONAL ASSISTANCE FOR CRITICAL RESOURCE PROJECTS.—Section 219(f) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 335) is amended by adding at the end the following: " (45) WASHINGTON, D.C, AND MARYLAND. —$15,000,000 for the project described in subsection (c)(1), modified to include measures to eliminate or control combined sewer overflows in the Anacostia River watershed. "(46) DUCK RIVER, CULLMAN, ALABAMA. —$5,000,000 for water supply infrastructure. Duck River, Cullman, Alabama. "(47) UNION COUNTY, ARKANSAS.— $52,000,000 for water supply infrastructure, including facilities for withdrawal, treatment, and distribution. Union County, Arkansas. "(48) CAMBRIA, CALIFORNIA.— $10,300,000 for desalination infrastructure, Cambria, California. "(49) Los ANGELES HARBOR/TERMINAL ISLAND, CALIFOR- NIA. — $6,500,000 for wastewater recycling infrastructure, Los Angeles Harbor/Terminal Island, California. "(50) NORTH VALLEY REGION, LANCASTER, CALIFORNIA. — $14,500,000 for water infrastructure, North Valley Region, Lancaster, California. " (51) SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. — $10,000,000 for water-related infrastructure, San Diego County, California. "(52) SOUTH PERRIS, CALIFORNIA.— $25,000,000 for water supply desalination infrastructure. South Perris, California. "(53) AURORA, ILLINOIS. —$8,000,000 for wastewater infrastructure to reduce or eliminate combined sewer overflows, Aurora, Illinois.

�