Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 113 Part 1.djvu/361

 PUBLIC LAW 106-53—AUG. 17, 1999 113 STAT. 337 " (32) ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI.—$15,000,000 for a project to eliminate or control combined sewer overflows in the city of St. Louis, Missouri. "(33) ELIZABETH, NEW JERSEY.— $20,000,000 for a project to eliminate or control combined sewer overflows in the city of Elizabeth, New Jersey. " (34) NORTH HUDSON, NEW JERSEY.— $10,000,000 for a project to eliminate or control combined sewer overflows in the city of North Hudson, New Jersey. " (35) INNER HARBOR PROJECT, NEW YORK, NEW YORK.— $15,000,000 for a project to eliminate or control combined sewer overflows for the inner harbor project. New York, New York. " (36) OUTER HARBOR PROJECT, NEW YORK, NEW YORK.— $15,000,000 for a project to eliminate or control combined sewer overflows for the outer harbor project, New York, New York. "(37) LEBANON, NEW HAMPSHIRE.—$8,000,000 for a project to eliminate or control combined sewer overflows in the city of Lebanon, New Hampshire. "(38) ASTORIA, OREGON.—$5,000,000 for a project to eliminate or control combined sewer overflows in the city of Astoria, Oregon. "(39) CACHE COUNTY, UTAH. —$5,000,000 for a wastewater infrastructure project for Cache County, Utah. "(40) LAWTON, OKLAHOMA.— $5,000,000 for a wastewater infrastructure project for the city of Lawton, Oklahoma. "(41) LANCASTER, CALIFORNIA. —$1,500,000 for a project to provide water facilities for the Fox Field Industrial Corridor, Lancaster, California. " (42) SAN RAMON VALLEY, CALIFORNIA.— $15,000,000 for a project for recycled water for San Rsimon Valley, California. "(43) HARBOR/SOUTH BAY, CALIFORNIA.— $15,000,000 for an industrial water reuse project for the Harbor/South Bay area, California.". SEC. 503. CONTAMINATED SEDIMENT DREDGING TECHNOLOGY. (a) REVIEW OF INNOVATIVE DREDGING TECHNOLOGIES.— (1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than June 1, 2001, the Secretary Deadline. shall complete a review of innovative dredging technologies designed to minimize or eliminate contamination of a water column upon removal of contaminated sediments. (2) TESTING. — (A) SELECTION OF TECHNOLOGY.— After completion of the review under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall select, from among the technologies reviewed, the technology that the Secretary determines will best increase the effectiveness of removing contaminated sediments and significantly reduce contamination of the water column. (B) AGREEMENT. —Not later than December 31, 2001, Deadline, the Secretary shall enter into an agreement with a public or private entity to test the selected technology in the vicinity of Peoria Ledses, Illinois. (3) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—T here is authorized to be appropriated to carry out this subsection $2,000,000. (b) ACCELERATED ADOPTION OF INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES.— Section 8 of the Water Resoxirces Development Act of 1988 (33 U.S.C. 2314) is amended— 33 USC 2314 note.

�