Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 113 Part 1.djvu/314

 113 STAT. 290 PUBLIC LAW 106-53—AUG. 17, 1999 (ii) establish policies and procedures for carrying out the studies and projects undertaken under this section. (B) CRITERIA.—The criteria referred to in subparagraph (A)(i) shall include, as a priority, the extent to which the appropriate State government supports the project. (e) PRIORITY AREAS.— In carrying out this section, the SecretsuTr shall ex£unine appropriate locations, including— (1) Pima County, Arizona, at Paseo De Las Iglesias and Rillito River; (2) Coachella Valley, Riverside County, California; (3) Los Angeles and Sein Gabriel Rivers, Cgdifomia; (4) Murrieta Creek, California; (5) Napa River Valley watershed, California, at Yountville, St. Helena, Calistoga, and American Canyon; (6) Santa Clara basin, California, at Upper GuadeJupe River and Tributsiries, Ssin Francisquito Creek, and Upper Penitencia Creek; (7) Pond Creek, Kentucky; (8) Red River of the North, Minnesota, North Dakota, and South Dakota; (9) Connecticut River, New Hampshire; (10) Pine Mount Creek, New Jersey; (11) Southwest Valley, Albuquerque, New Mexico; (12) Upper Delaware River, New York; (13) Briar Creek, North Ceirolina; (14) Chagrin River, Ohio; (15) Mill Creek, Cincinnati, Ohio; (16) Tillamook County, Oregon; (17) Willamette River basin, Oregon; (18) Blair County, Pennsylvania, at Altoona and Frankstown Township; (19) Delaware River, Pennsylvania; (20) Schuylkill River, Pennsylvania; (21) Providence County, Rhode Island; (22) Shenandoah River, Virginia; and (23) Lincoln Creek, Wisconsin. (f) PROGRAM REVIEW.— (1) IN GENERAL.—The program established under this section shall be subject to an independent review to evaluate the efficacy of the program in achieving the dual goals of flood hazard mitigation and riverine restoration. Deadline. (2) REPORT. —Not later than April 15, 2003, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate a report on the findings of the review conducted under this subsection with any recommendations concerning continuation of the program. (g) MAXIMUM FEDERAL COST PER PROJECT. — Not more than $30,000,000 may be expended by the United States on any single project under this section. (h) PROCEDURE.— (1) ALL PROJECTS. —The Secretary shall not implement any project under this section until—

�