Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 113 Part 1.djvu/303

 PUBLIC LAW 106-53—AUG. 17, 1999 113 STAT. 279 Graheim, Texas: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated October 6, 1998, at a total cost of $10,080,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $6,560,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $3,520,000. (b) PROJECTS SUBJECT TO A FINAL REPORT. —The following projects for water resources development and conservation and other purposes are authorized to be cgirried out by the Secretary substantially in accordance with the plans, and subject to the conditions, recommended in a final report of the Chief of Engineers if a favorable report of the Chief is completed not later than December 31, 1999: (1) HERITAGE HARBOR, WRANGELL, ALASKA. —The project for navigation. Heritage Harbor, Wrangell, Alaska, at a total cost of $24,556,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $14,447,000 and estimated non-Federal cost of $10,109,000. (2) ARROYO PASAJERO, CALIFORNIA.— The project for flood damage reduction, Arroyo Pasajero, California, at a total cost of $260,700,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $170,100,000 and an estimated non-Federed cost of $90,600,000. (3) HAMILTON AIRFIELD, CALIFORNIA. —The project for environmental restoration, Hamilton Airfield, California, at a total cost of $55,200,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $41,400,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $13,800,000. (4) SUCCESS DAM, TULE RIVER BASIN, CALIFORNDV.— The project for flood damage reduction and water supply. Success Dam, Tule River basin, California, at a total cost of $17,900,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $11,635,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $6,265,000. (5) DELAWARE BAY COASTLINE, DELAWARE AND NEW JERSEY: OAKWOOD BEACH, NEW JERSEY. —The project for shore protection, Delaware Bay coastline, Delaware and New Jersey: Oakwood Beach, New Jersey, at a total cost of $3,360,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $2,184,000 and an estimated non- Federal cost of $1,176,000, and at an estimated average annual cost of $81,000 for periodic noiuishment over the 50-year life of the project, with an estimated annual Federal cost of $53,000 and an estimated annual non-Federal cost of $28,000. (6) DELAWARE BAY COASTLINE, DELAWARE AND NEW JERSEY: REEDS BEACH AND PIERCES POINT, NEW JERSEY. —The project for shore protection and ecosystem restoration, Delaware Bay coastline, Delaware and New Jersey: Reeds Beach and Pierces Point, New Jersey, at a total cost of $4,057,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $2,637,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $1,420,000. (7) LITTLE TALBOT ISLAND, DUVAL COUNTY, FLORIDA.— The project for hurricane and storm damage prevention and shore protection, Little Tzdbot Island, Duv^ County, Florida, at a total cost of $5,915,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $3,839,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $2,076,000. (8) PONCE DE LEON INLET, FLORIDA.—The project for navigation and related purposes. Ponce de Leon Inlet, Volusia County, Florida, at a total cost of $5,454,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $2,988,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $2,466,000. (9) SAVANNAH HARBOR EXPANSION, GEORGIA.— (A) IN GENERAL.— Subject to subparagraph (B), the project for navigation. Savannah Harbor expansion.

�