Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 110 Part 5.djvu/591

 PUBLIC LAW 104-303—OCT. 12, 1996 110 STAT. 3665 at a total cost of $4,440,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $2,300,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $2,140,000. (17) WEST BANK OF THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER, NEW ORLEANS (EAST OF HARVEY CANAL), LOUISIANA.—The project for hurricane damage reduction. West Bank of the Mississippi River in the vicinity of New Orleans (East of Harvey Canal), Louisiana: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated May 1, 1995, at a total cost of $126,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $82,200,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $43,800,000. (18) BLUE RIVER BASIN, KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI.—The project for flood control. Blue River Basin, Kansas City, Missouri: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated September 5, 1996, at a total cost of $17,082,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $12,043,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $5,039,000. (19) WOOD RIVER, GRAND ISLAND, NEBRASKA. —The project for flood control. Wood River, Grand Island, Nebraska: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated May 3, 1994, at a total cost of $11,800,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $6,040,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $5,760,000. (20) LAS CRUCES, NEW MEXICO.—The project for flood control. Las Cruces, New Mexico: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated June 24, 1996, at a total cost of $8,278,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $5,494,000 and an estimated non- Federal cost of $2,784,000. (21) ATLANTIC COAST OF LONG ISLAND, NEW YORK.— The project for storm damage reduction, Atlantic Coast of Long Island from Jones Inlet to East Rockaway Inlet, Long Beach Island, New York: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated April 5, 1996, at a total cost of $72,091,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $46,859,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $25,232,000. (22) CAPE FEAR—NORTHEAST (CAPE FEAR) RIVERS, NORTH CAROLINA. —The project for navigation. Cape Fear—Northeast (Cape Fear) Rivers, North Carolina: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated September 9, 1996, at a total cost of $221,735,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $132,936,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $88,799,000. (23) WILMINGTON HARBOR, CAPE FEAR RIVER, NORTH CARO- LINA. — The project for navigation, Wilmington Harbor, Cape Fear and Northeast Cape Fear Rivers, North Carolina: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated June 24, 1994, at a total cost of $23,953,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $15,572,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $8,381,000. (24) DUCK CREEK, CINCINNATI, OHIO. —The project for flood control. Duck Creek, Cincinnati, Ohio: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated June 28, 1994, at a total cost of $15,947,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $11,960,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $3,987,000. (25) WILLAMETTE RIVER TEMPERATURE CONTROL, MCKENZIE SUBBASIN, OREGON.—The project for environmental restoration, Willamette River Temperature Control, McKenzie Subbasin, Oregon: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated February 1, 1996, at a total Federal cost of $38,000,000. (26) RIO GRANDE DE ARECIBO, PUERTO RICO. —The project for flood control, Rio Grande de Arecibo, Puerto Rico: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated April 5, 1994, at a total

�