Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 106 Part 6.djvu/256

 106 STAT. 4814 PUBLIC LAW 102-580—OCT. 31, 1992 (9) TANGIER ISLAND, VIRGINIA.—^A navigation project for construction of a breakwater to protect navigation mdlities at Tangier Island, Virginia. SEC. 106. SMALL FLOOD CONTROL PBOJECTS. (a) PROJECT AUTHORIZATIONS.— The Secretary shall conduct a study for each of the following projects and, if the Secretary determines that the project is feasible, shall canv out the project under section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s): (1) BLUE RIVER AND BROCK CREEK, SALEM, INDIANA.—A project for flood control, West Fork of the Blue River and Brodc Creek, Salem, Indiana. (2) WHITE RIVER, ELNORA, INDIANA.—A project for flood control. White River, Elnora, Indiana. (3) WHITE RIVER, GIBSON COUNTY, INDIANA.—A project for flood control. White River, Hazelton, Gibson County, Indiana. (4) WHITE RIVER, PETERSBURG, INDIANA.—A project for flood control. White River, Petersburg, Indiana. (5) WABASH RIVER, KNOX COUNTY, INDIANA.—A project for flood control Wabash River, Knox County, Indiana. (6) RED RIVER AT GRAND MARAIS OUTLET, MINNESOTA.— A project for flood control, Red River at Grand Marais Outlet, Minnesota. (7) SULLIVAN RUN CREEK, BUTLER, PENNSYLVANIA. —A project forfloodcontrol, Sullivan Rim Creek, Butler, Pennsylvania. The non-Federal share of the cost of the project shall be determined in accordance with section 103(m) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. (8) LITTLE FOSSIL CREEK, TEXAS.—A project forfloodcontrol. Little Fossil Creek, Tarrant County, Texas. (9) TURPENTINE RUN, ST. THOMAS, VIRGIN ISLANDS.— A project for flood control, Turpentine Run, St. Thomas, Virgin Islands. (b) ST. PETERS, ST. CHARLES COUNTY, MISSOURI.— (1) MAXIMUM ALLOTMENT.— The maximum amount which may be allotted under section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 7018) for the project for flood control, St. Peters, St. Charles County, Missouri, shall be $10,000,000 instead of $5,000,000. The Secretary shall revise the local cooperation agreement for such project entered into under section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 to conform with the increase under this paragraph in the Federal participation in such project. (2) COST SHARING.— Nothing in this subsection shall be construed as aflecting any cost snaring requirements applicable to the project under the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. California. SEC. 106. SONOMA BAYLANDS WETLAND DEMONSTRATION PROJECT. (a) IN GENERAL.— The Secretary is directed to develop and canv out in accordance with this section a 320-acre Sonoma Baylands wetland demonstration project in the San Francisco Bay- Delta estuary, California. The project shall utilize dredged material suitable for aquatic disposal to restore, protect, and expand the Sonoma Baylands for the purposes of preserving waterfowl, fish, and other wetland dependent species of plants and animals and to providefloodcontrol, water quality improvement, and sedimentation control.

�