Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 106 Part 2.djvu/720

 106 STAT. 1600 PUBLIC LAW 102-389—OCT. 6, 1992 ities, and in the amounts indicated: Boston, Massachusetts, $100,000,000; New York, New York, $70,000,000; Los Angeles, California, $55,000,000; San Diego, California, $45,500,000; and Seattle, Washington, $35,000,000; and notwithstanding any other provision of law, $82,000,000 shall be available for Rouge River National Wet Weather Demonstration Project grants, not to exceed 85 per centum of total project costs, to be awarded by the Administrator, who is authorized to make such grants to Wayne County, Michigan, such grants to be for the construction of sanitary sewers and retention basins, for the repair and maintenance of wastewater treatment plants and collection systems, and for the investigation of commercial and industrial facilities and storm sewer connections to implement the Rouge River National Demonstration Project for Wet Weather Flows; and notwithstanding any other provision of law, $40,000,000 shall be for making grants under title II of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended, to the appropriate instrumentality for the purpose of constructing advancea sewage treatment facilities to serve Baltimore, Maryland, in furtherance of the objectives of the Chesapeake Bay Agreement; and notwithstanding any other provision of law, $19,000,000 shall be for making a grant under title II of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended, to the Ocean Coimty Utilities Authority, in the State of New Jersey for necessary modifications and replacements to the Carver-Greenfield sewage treatment plant; and notwithstanding any other provision of law, $7,000,000 shall be for making a grant under title II of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended, to the appropriate instrumentality for necessary work to remove and reroute the existing sewer lines at the Centennial Ol3rmpic Stadium site in the City of Atlanta, Georgia; $50,000,000 shall be for grants to the State of Texas, which is to be matched by an equal amount of State funds from State sources, for the purpose of improving wastewater treatment in colonias in that State, induding $2,000,000 for planning and design; $10,000,000 shall be for a grant to the State of New Mexico for the purpose of improving wastewater treatment in colonias in that State; and $10,000,000 shall be for a grant to the State of Arizona for an interceptor/ collection system in the city of Avondale, Arizona; and notwithstanding any other provision of law, from sums previously appropriated under this heading for grants under title II of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended, and reserved by the South Dakota Department of Environment and Natural Resources, the Administrator shall make a grant, not to exceed 55 per centum of total project costs, to the Town of Pollock, South Dakota for necessary reconstruction of Pollock's wastewater treatment facility, consistent with the approved facility plan of October 1990; and sums heretofore, herein or hereafter appropriated under this heading for the District of Columbia, either allotted for title VI capitalization grants and pursuant to Public Law 101-144 as amended by Public Law 101-302 authorized to be used for title II construction grants, or title II construction ^aata, may be used for title II construction grants for any activities eligible under title VI, and the limitations contained in sections 201(g)(l) and 204(a)(5) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended, do not apply to these grants: Provided, That of the funds appropriated for the State Revolving Fund under title VI of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended, up to one-half of 1 percent may be made available by the Administrator for direct grants to Indian tribes

�